Quantcast
Channel: nerds of a feather, flock together
Viewing all 3569 articles
Browse latest View live

Book Review: The Infinite Miles

$
0
0
Meeting your idol can turn out better than expected 


I wonder if the urge to write time travel fiction somehow proceeded from the very act of remembering. Human languages have tenses for the past conditional and moods for the past subjunctive; we have always been able to imagine how things could have gone differently. We all have regrets, and they are painful; the resolution ‘to live life with no regrets’ would not be so common if it weren’t. Today, on the topic of time travel, we shall be discussing Hannah Fergesen’s (who uses they/them pronouns) novel The Infinite Miles, published by Blackstone Publishing in 2023.

The blurbs on this book keep comparing it to Doctor Who; as someone who has never watched Doctor Who, I am not in a position to properly judge that claim (yes, I am going to turn in my nerd card now). What it does have is time travel galore, and a memorably shaped mode of time travel, in this case a spaceship that can assume the form of any vehicle that is germane to its surroundings, such as a car on Earth or a broken-down spaceship on a lawless world where better ships are likely to be stolen (and that isn’t even the most clever of them). But Fergesen goes further than that; they wrote their story to get really, really meta, in a way that feels like a very nerdy twenty-first century take on Italo Calvino’s If On a Winter’s Night a Traveler.

Your main character is Harper Starling, a college dropout who, not long before the events of the novel, had a nasty falling out with her oldest friend Peggy. Harper and Peggy bonded over their love of the widely acclaimed science fiction television show Infinite Odyssey, of which they have come to memorize large parts. Harper leaves a promising course of study at Columbia out of the pain that ensued from the breakup, and now lives in misery in a small apartment in New York, until she sees Peggy again. Peggy appears possessed by … something, and Harper doesn’t know what to do. She has to flee, Peggy in hot pursuit, until she stumbles into a series of events that lead her to be thrown back in time to the New York of 1971, not long before Infinite Odyssey premiered on television.

You can tell Fergesen put a lot of research into this book; there’s a way that they immerse you in the grimy reality of New York of 1971 that really gets under your skin, something like if Martin Scorsese was a regular attendee of a science fiction convention. They are attentive to smells and sounds and the differences in the way that people interact with each other, not all of them for the best. You are thrust into this world, with all its differences ripping you out of the twenty-first century, but it’s familiar enough you’re never too lost (it helps, of course, that the seventies are, as of writing, still in living memory). Time travel works don’t often treat the period in the later decades of the twentieth century as a destination for adventures, which gives the whole thing a somewhat jarring undertone that really works. It’s familiar enough to lull you into a false sense of security.

There’s a strong metatextual element here; there is a part of this book set at the world’s first Star Trek fan convention. Much of the book revolves around Harper and Peggy’s love of Infinite Odyssey, what it has meant to each of them, and to both of them collectively, and what they have on some level imposed onto it. This is about what it means to be a creator, and to be a fan, and what the interaction between those two categories mean. But, for everyone except the most shut-in, the media we consume frames how we interact with others, and everything in the plot puts their friendship to the test.

Fergesen is willing to play with the various manifestations of time travel a lot, and to great effect. There is a time when Harper meets the same character at two different times in the past, but two different instances of their travel, which is something that feels logical given the tropes of time travel but I can’t recall ever actually being used. More broadly, there is a willingness to interrogate just how much damage the careless use of time travel can do, be it to the timeline more broadly, or to actual individuals, including oneself. Time travel intersects with immortality in this novel, and it can warp one’s psyche in ways that can be very harmful to everybody.

Another strand of this novel is the idea of escaping. We have all wanted to escape our lives, if only briefly. We have all experienced pain that has brought us to that point. The Infinite Miles asks how possible that truly is, and if it is truly desirable to begin with. Whether you are Harper trying to escape into a television show, or a boy in rural Iowa wanting to go beyond the suffocating atmosphere of his family. In different ways, both characters get to see that, and then they see the consequences of it. Sometimes this is deeply painful, but other times it is awe-inspiring; not wanting to spoil much, but the best scene of this nature is set in a museum. Blended with the very modern concerns is Fergesen’s good grasp on the ingredients of that good old sense of wonder, especially when the novel starts to become a space opera, of sorts (no singing, unfortunately, but the libretto is pretty big).

The Infinite Miles is a book that, by the end, earns the sobriquet of ‘beautiful.’ It is not just the high adventure or the loving paean to being a nerd, but the human factor underlying it. Everyone who reads this will have some sort of loss, some sort of regret, that this novel will tug on. Fergesen takes the universal and clothes it in the garb of science fiction conventions and long hours spent binge-watching genre shows, and the end result is something I found to be very moving. I recommend this book very highly.

Also, the title’s a pun.

--

Nerd Coefficient: 9/10

Reference: Fergesen, Hannah The Infinite Miles [Blackstone, 2023]

POSTED BY: Alex Wallace, alternate history buff who reads more than is healthy.

TV Review: House of the Dragon Season 2

$
0
0

Is this season slow? Yes. But honestly, how many dragon dances, child murders, and to-the-death twin fights can we have in a season before drama loses all meaning?


As a lifelong fantasy disliker, I've taken a strange route to my love of all things Game of Thrones. In fact, I'd dare say George R.R. Martin kickstarted my love of dragons, an interest until recently I'd actively disavowed. 

But House of the Dragon, like Game of Thrones before it, isn't just fantasy — it's about human beings (granted, I know fantasy lovers will say that there's tons of others depictions that are more worthy, but this was my entry and I'm obsessed). 

When rumors of House of the Dragon started appearing on the scene, I still scoffed though. Who cares about the backstory to the Targaryen dynasty's fall? Turns out I do! As I quickly raise my hand like the sentient Four Seasons baby meme

Season one of the show was fairly well acclaimed, which led us to the epic marketing campaign this summer in anticipation of season two. Choose your side! The bridge-spanning AI banners down epic New York City landmarks! Team Green or Team Black! (I cannot imagine a world in which anyone roots for Team Green. If you do, please email me your reasoning.) 

This season, as it progressed weekly from June 16 until August 4, was eight episodes — two installments fewer than every other Westerosi-inspired HBO series. 

It begins almost immediately after the events of the season one finale, namely after Aemond kills Lucerys on dragonback. This begins a theme that will dominate all season: how do you answer cruelty without becoming the enemy yourself? Rhaenyra demands vengeance, but Daemon goes a bridge too far and sends assassins into Kings Landing to exact revenge, a son for a son. Only they get the wrong son, and poor sweet Helaena's baby is killed instead. Not exactly the most positive way to kickstart a new season, but hey, this is Westeros, and George R.R. Martin will kill anyone, even children. 

There's so much to talk about this season (despite what the naysayers are shouting into the void on X), so I think I'll focus on my top five moments and low five moments. 

Top five moments

1.  Getting to know the dragons better

We get three dragons in Game of Thrones, but I never felt like we settled into their personalities or lives. They were just ... around Danerys, but apart from knowing (some?) of their names, I couldn't tell you the difference between them any more than I could tell the difference between three crossbows. They were just weapons. With House of the Dragon, though, we learn the names of multiple dragons and their respective riders, and they're all extremely different. I love the way the show explores the concept of unattached dragons, too, and how the bond between rider and dragon is paramount to the success of the Targaryens. 

2. Rhaenys' final sacrifice 

The Queen Who Never Was tried telling Rhaenyra early on that the realm wasn't kind to women in positions of power, and she was proved right when King Viserys ultimately had more sons with Alicent. But nevertheless, Rhaenys stood by Rhaenyra's side with Meleys, her battle-hardened dragon. Honestly, by the time of her death, she was probably exhausted — she'd been fighting for a while, and both her children had died tragically. But she knew what was on the right side, and in the end she died supporting her brother's final wish that named Rhaenyra as rightful heir to the Iron Throne. 

3. Everytime Rhaenyra is on screen

Emma D'Arcy's portrayal of Rhaenyra is what would happen if you asked AI to create an epic Targaryen queen. It's picture perfect, of course, but also one imbued with empathy, ire, and real humanity. She knows that she should be ruling, but there's a world of scheming patriarchy fighting her at every turn. Whether she's angling to keep control of her own small council or deep in study over the potential genealogical lines of dragonriders, you never doubt her commitment to ruling the seven kingdoms — and she deserves to, especially compared to her degenerate half-brothers.

4. Chekhov's smallfolk

Throughout the season the showrunners pepper into the plot these strange glimpses into the lives of ordinary residents of King's Landing. I wondered at first why we were getting these random takes, but it turns out it's for a pretty cool reason — these three smallfolk (Ulf, Hugh, and Addam) possess enough dragon-rider blood that they'll eventually be able to become riders for the lonely dragons of Team Black. Now, I don't much about Westerosi royalty OR dragons, but even I know that's pretty special. But also question: Was Corlys loading that damn ship ALL SEASON or was it just me? There's so many scenes of sailors loading boxes onto that boat that it was like a scene from Law & Order where they're interrogating a reticent dock worker who won't stop working.

5. Larys' finagling

In Game of Thrones, we were privy to two of the most epic finaglers of all time — Littlefinger and Varys. Their predecessor? Why it's clearly Larys Strong, a disabled member of a powerful house that somehow has found himself at the court of Team Green and wishes to make some serious moves. Is he good at his job? I'm not exactly sure! But I like seeing him try, and I also enjoy seeing Aemond completely ignore him during his time as Prince Regent.

Low five moments

1. Daemon's haunted mansion adventure at Harrenhall

Is this season slow? Yes. But honestly, how many dragon dances, child murders, and to-the-death twin fights can we have in a season before drama loses all meaning? I think people get addicted to beloved character deaths for which George R.R. Martin IP is so known. But the pace is unsustainable. That being said, however — I could not have been less interested in Daemon's time spent at Harrenhall. Yes, I understand he had to secure the Riverlands. Yes, he was mad at Rhaenyra. But man was this drafty and rainy castle boring. The one exception? Ser Simon Strong! 

2. Ser Cristen Cole, full stop

I just don't like his smarmy face. 

3. Alicent's quick-change of feeling

Alicent, to be fair, misunderstood dying, drugged Viserys when he uttered his last words (there's a lot of Targaryens with the same name, also in her defense). But she made moves to challenge Rhaenyra's claim to the throne, so a lot of this season is technically her fault. By episode eight however, she realizes she's made a huge mistake. This, I don't buy — she's known for a while that her two songs are douchebags. She saw both Aegon and Aemond at the council table and realized they were not kind rulers. But surely she had some inkling before. There was one scene in particular where she severely chastises Aegon for not listening to the council and their wisdom, especially after all their machinations to get him to the throne. That makes you realize — what was it all for? For the Hightowers to rule as a proxy? Did she even want that? I'm not sure what Alicent wants, but by the season finale she basically asks her one true love Rhaenyra to run away together. 

4. The Riverlands negotiations

Look, I like a lot of the lore of Westeros. Put me in front of some Starks, some Tullys, some Lannisters, some Martells, and I'm happy. But dealing with the Blackwoods and Brackens? Total snooze fest. If someone can tell me why I feel this way, I'm happy to listen. 

5. Aemond's motivation

Aemond had a very tragic childhood incident involving his eye, but did that really turn him completely evil? It's possible I suppose, but unlike a lot of characters, he's more like King Joffrey in Game of Thrones in that he's completely a static evil bad guy.

Final take

I liked this season, slow that it was. Episodes 5 and 6 were especially painstaking, and I found myself wishing they'd fly by a little quicker. But I enjoyed my weekly Dragon Tales, and I remain in awe of the acting, production design, and CGI. These dragons are in fact stellar, and I'm once again shocked to find myself googling the names of different beasts after an episodes so I can learn more about their traits and history (The black dread?!?! So cool.) 

I count that as a success.  

--

The Math

Nerd coefficient: 7/10

POSTED BY: Haley Zapal, new NoaF contributor and lawyer-turned-copywriter living in Atlanta, Georgia. A co-host of Hugo Award-winning podcast Hugo, Girl!, she posts on Instagram as @cestlahaley. She loves nautical fiction, Vidalia onions, and growing corn and giving them pun names like Anacorn Skywalker. 

Book Review: Road to Ruin by Hana Lee

$
0
0

wild ride science fantasy of magic, motorcycles, and the extremely complicated hearts and maps of human relationships.

It’s a love story between a prince, a princess, and the person delivering the messages between them. You think you know this story, and perhaps you are thinking of Twelfth Night, or Cyrano de Bergerac, or any other number of stories where two individuals and the person conveying messages between them are caught in romantic entanglement with one of the principals.

But this is different. This is a post apocalyptic world of magic and technology, of magic users who fight storms and magical motorcycles. A story of a world facing deep problems that could wipe away the tenuous hold the cities have in this wasteland. Oh, and the love story is polyamorous and queer in that the messenger is secretly in love with both the prince and the princess.

This is the story of Hana Lee’s Road to Ruin.

Road to Ruin
is a novel that defies some tropes right from the get go. Classically in a lot of myths, legends, stories and sadly novels to this day, the prince rescues the hapless princess from the tower, and go on off together to a happily ever after. The prince gets to have the powers, abilities and skills and the princess is there to be rescued. Although Jin, our magebike courier sending messages between them is our primary point of view and protagonist, this script is unended right from the start. And Yi-Nereen is a princess trapped in her city state of Kerina Rut, and about to be forced into a marriage she manifestly does not want (even above and beyond her feelings for Kadrin). But she is also a sorceress and has an important role in defending the city as one of the city’s shields against the storms that batter the wastelands. If anything, Kadrin feels like *he* is the one without skills or usefulness, and points this out a couple of times in the narrative. He does, in the end, find value and worth in his skills and abilities and the challenges that they face in the story.

The story runs on two tracks. In the present, we get Jin delivering what turns out to be the last letter Yi-Nereen receives from Kadrinx, even as she is ready to be married against her will and desire, and very soon. Desperate times call for desperate measures, and so Jin is recruited by Yi-Nareeen to spirit her away from Kerina Rut to Kerina Sol the home city of our Prince Kadrin. To be charitable, this doesn’t go immediately to plan. And of course, Yi-Nereen’s family does not take this sitting down and soon dispatches forces to retrieve the wayward princess. Oh, and her own fiancee, not satisfied with that, set off on his own. And then there is the prince...

The other track of the story are a series of letters between Kadrin and Yi-Nareen. As much as it shows their burgeoning relationship in an epistolary mode, there is important context and background laid in these letters that helps us to understand what drives both characters, and also Yi-Nareen’s project regarding the heritability of magical talents. This latter feeds right back into the main plot when Jin and Yi-Nareen’s efforts to reach the city of Kerina Sol are foiled by the mother of all storms, and their detour is straight into a hidden community, and, as it turns out, secrets long buried about the world, about magic, and the previous civilization.

For all of the post apocalyptic landscape, this story and its settings and framings are all about societies and groups of people. Yes, the desert landscape and its storm and Jin riding across it are vividly and winningly described. It’s an immersive world that kept my mind going to my limited travels into Utah and the desert southwest, and I had a real urge and desire to go to Utah again after reading this book*. But ultimately the book really pivots and revolves around communities and relationships, and the variety of both that we get. Prince Kadrin’s family and home, especially his relationship with his father, as well as the whole ethos of the city-state. Princess Yi-Nareen’s city state and her family, her betrothed, and others. The desert community that Yi-Nareen and Jin stumble into. The relationship between the three principals. Oh, and if that was not enough, Jin’s ex-lover enters into the scene and plays a major role in events. The plot and worldbuilding really runs off on how these relationships and communities spin off and against each other.

But I do want to talk a bit about worldbuilding and the feel of the science fantasy that we get here in Road to Ruin. The most common way for these sorts of stories to run, especially post apocalypse ones in a wasteland setting like this, is a desperate clawing for survival, as resources dwindle and things become more and more dire for all involved. The whole idea of “the world as an open grave” and ever so steadily spiraling downward is a theme that I see, for example, in the roleplaying game Other Dust, which is all about this feel. And we do get a heaping of this in the novel. Yi-Kareen’s city state of Karina Rut, and the overall feel IS this, trying to keep enough shield capable magicians going to protect the city against storms.

And there are some of the usual sort of tropes you get in societies on the edge. Kerina Rut does not permit women with magic (Talented) to read. Kerina Sol is extremely unforgiving to those (like Kadrin) without Talent at all. Societies under stress often turn to drastic and unforgiving solutions and cultural standards and workarounds in an environment of scarcity.

And yet, all that is not the whole story. The central and defining science fantasy element of Lee’s novel, the Magebike, is in fact, something that was only invented several decades ago (and who and why and what happened to the inventor becomes extremely plot relevant). There are other instances in the novel where there are efforts at innovation, at trying new things, at being curious about the world and doing better with a “bad hand”. A lot of post-apocalyptic stories are all about “raging against the dying of the light” with a lot of trying to shore up the walls. I appreciate that as the standard run of how these stories go. However, Lee shows us that even in an apocalypse and its aftermath, there are people trying to find new ways and new methods (my recent non fiction reading has strongly influenced my thought on these matters.)**

I want to go back to what I mentioned in the beginning and not hide it under a basket. The novel is queer friendly although I am not entirely certain it’s queernorm. Our princess does mention the possibility of romantic entanglements with women (but when it comes husband time, such pursuits are put away, firmly). Jin is as mentioned in love with the prince and princess both, and her ex-lover, a woman features strongly in the plot. Kadrin seems firmly fixated on Yi-Nareen, though. If he is genderqueer, the text does not support it. But the pain and agony of relationships here is all socially based and matters of the heart, not restrictions on gender based on social and societal standards.

As far as the ending of the book, while the main threat and issue is resolved at the end of this book, the book does definitely have a sequel hook given what occurs. While I do feel the ending of this book was somewhat compressed and rushed compared to the rest of the book, I have curiosity as to the fate of Jin, Yi-Kareen, Kadrin and their world. I do want to know more about all of it, the story of these three characters, the world of the ancient Road Builders, and what it all means. I’d definitely be up for a sequel.

* In the acknowledgements, Lee calls out Mad Max Fury Road. That’s the visual feel she is going for in the novel. And I think she hits her marks.

** I seem to be in a Post apocalyptic mood, lately. I recently read Eric Cline’s AFTER 1177 BC, which is about the aftermath of the Bronze Age Collapse (a followup to his book 1177 BC, which is all about the collapse). This new book is about how societies in the Mediterranean dealt with, or didn’t, with the results for various societies. Some stagnated, some recovered, others slowly declined, some found new horizons, and some did rather well for a time. The other book in this vein is Paul Cooper’s Fall of Civilizations, which looks at a number of civilizations, their heights and collapse, and what happened next for them.

--

The Math

Highlights:

  • An interesting and vividly seen desert apocalyptic world
  • A winning combination of science and fantasy
  • Excellent action and emotional beats alike.

Reference: Lee, Hana, Road to Ruin [Saga Press, 2024]


POSTED BY: Paul Weimer. Ubiquitous in Shadow, but I'm just this guy, you know? @princejvstin.

Interview with David Flin

$
0
0

Today on Nerds of Feather, Paul Weimer interviews David Flin

Hello, David.  Why don’t we begin with you telling me, from your point of view, the 30,000 foot introduction to David Flin?

There’s a saying that life is what happens while you’re making plans. That’s certainly true in my case. I’m still not entirely sure what I want to do when I grow up, but in the meantime, I’ll just get on with what’s in front of me.

But introducing myself? Well, currently I’m the owner of Sergeant Frosty Publications, which publishes mostly fiction for children and young adults. I also write a few books, again mostly fiction for children and young adults.

Which tells you very little about me, in fact.

So how did a 71-year-old man with a bad back, fairly severe PTSD issues, and an eclectic collection of experiences come to get where I am today?

I guess my life can be broken into five distinct phases, although the fourth and fifth kind of elide into each other.

Phase 1. 1953-1969. Childhood.

I’m an East End boy, a Londoner from the East End (Dagenham, to be precise). Which, while it has now become somewhat gentrified, but back then it was very much the rough end of the city.

This was made harder for me by the fact that I’m mixed race. (Grandparents being: Irish, Belgian-English, Sicilian, Jamaican). This period was not one where there was a great deal of racial sensitivity; my nickname at the time was “Breed” (short for Half-Breed). One learned to live with it.

It was also in the near aftermath of WW2, and unexploded bombs could still be found amidst piles of rubble that still hadn’t been cleared.

When I was 13, my father was killed in Borneo, and my mother rather fell apart for a time following this. Which meant that I found myself responsible for looking after the family. Which meant I left school (unofficially, but no-one cared about East End boys playing truant) and had to find an income.

I became a “nut.” That is, in the terminology of the time, a heavy usually fairly new for one of the Gentlemen (Gang boss). I was actually more of a runner.

It wasn’t a fun time for me, but it did drive home a number of personality quirks: the willingness to take on responsibility; a clan-like approach to family; an abiding sense that life isn’t fair and it ought to be.

And, when I was 16, I joined the Royal Marines, and into the second phase of my life.

I think the book that I associate with my childhood is Kim, by Rudyard Kipling. It’s about a young lad, regarded as an outsider to two societies (British and Indian), from the lower class portion of society, with a father and mother both lost to him. It resonated strongly with me, for all that Kipling had problematic views (albeit quite normal views for his time). But the man had a keen journalist’s eye, a nice turn of phrase, a good ear for the rhythm of speech, and wrote a cracking good yarn to appeal to youths on the verge of becoming adults.

Being the owner and publisher of a small press like Sergeant Frosty Publications is no small task. It does give you an opportunity to extend your voice beyond just your own works, however. What is your goal and mission and ethos in what you publish for the press?

To explain that, I have to go back to how I started the company. It was 2020, during the worst of Covid, and I was being treated for cancer. (For those of a nervous disposition, the fact that it’s now 2024 and I’m still around to write is a bit of a giveaway that the treatment was successful). While I was in the hospital for treatment, I met some children there who were also being treated for cancer.

That was just plain wrong. Seeing the children with bald heads (as a result of chemotherapy) and attached to drips—it stirred me to a feeling of anger. There’s nothing I could do medically for these children, but I felt I had to do something.

My son reminded me how often I’d grumbled about publishers, and how often I had said I could do a better job.

On reflection, I realised that he had a point. And that was how Sergeant Frosty Publications came to be born, and became a reality as soon as my course of treatments was over. The raison d’être for the company is to provide a source of entertainment for those children going through the scary process of being treated for cancer. Oh, it may well entertain other children as well, but when I am writing or editing or selecting stories, it’s the children in the Royal Marsden Hospital that I have in mind.

Which, of course, gives a guideline for the type of stories I look for. Essentially upbeat and encouraging. There are some factual pieces (such as Andy Cooke’s How to Build a Moonbase, or Brad Rousse’s The Statue of Liberty), but generally the books are fiction for various age groups.

It may sound terribly pompous on my part, but I’m aiming for the Reithian Principles: Inform, Educate, Entertain. How well I succeed is another matter.

I have also published a couple of anthologies of alternate history stories, aimed at adults. These (Building a Better Future and Ten Years Later) were put together in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and all proceeds from these books goes to the Red Cross appeal to help with humanitarian aid and funding for reconstruction of Ukraine. In the grand scheme of things, it’s fairly modest in the amounts they have raised (just over and just under £1000 respectively), but it helps assuage that feeling of helplessness one might otherwise feel in the face of seeing Evil unfold.

Sorry, it’s a subject I have strong views on. My son’s fiancée, Ekaterina, is from Ukraine, and it’s been a stressful couple of years.

Aside from that little digression, I also like to give opportunities to young people through the company. For example, my first cover artist was a talented artist who was finishing at school and was considering a career in art. She did covers for me while at school and university so that she could build up her professional portfolio to show to future potential employers. It must have been successful, because she’s now finished university, and is working in design. Of course, now that she’s working, she wants professional rates, which my budget wouldn’t stretch to, so I had to start looking for a replacement.

I’m pleased to say I think I’ve found one; they are heavily autistic and have difficulties in society. Hopefully, this will give them a creative outlet to the world. Time will tell.

That, if anything, is the ethos of Sergeant Frosty Publications. I can’t help everyone, and I can’t make world-changing benefits. But I can provide a helping hand here and there and, to my mind, if everyone did that, the world would be a better place.

And I guess you also want to know why I chose the name “Sergeant Frosty.” There is –inevitably– a story attached to that.

Long, long ago, when I was a young Royal Marine, we were on an exercise in Arctic Norway. This was back in the days of the Soviet Union, and there was a fear that the Soviets might invade down the spine of Norway.

The purpose of the exercise was to find out how long it would take reinforcements to arrive to support the Royal Marines, who were the designated rapid response. Basically, we were to get there and buy time for the heavy support to arrive.

What that meant was that we were sitting on a hill in the Arctic in winter, waiting.

And waiting.

And waiting.

We got very bored. There’s not a lot to do on a hill in north Norway in winter.

So we converted some packing crates to boards –what today would be called snowboards– and we built snowmen on them and pushed them down the hill, and they crashed and exploded in a shower of snow on the way down.

All except one, who survived no less than three trips. We decided that this was a Sergeant Snowman (strictly, a Snow-Marine) because sergeants are, as every recruit knows, indestructible. Thus was born Sergeant Frosty.

That would have been an end to things, except when I told bedtime stories to my son, I used Sergeant Frosty as a character in some of the stories.

And then, when I started writing stories for children, I included a few Christmas stories which, for reasons only a psychiatrist could fathom, starred Sergeant Frosty (Christmas with Sergeant Frosty). And when I needed a name for the publishing company, I turned to that name.

It’s amazing how things keep coming back.

Editing anthologies is a tricky business. (They are also hard to review!) Tell me about how you went about acquiring, choosing and arranging the stories for anthologies such as the pair you've just mentioned you've done to support Ukraine, Building a Better Future and Ten Years Later.

The two were produced with different priorities. The first, Building a Better Future, was produced just after the invasion started in February 2022. This was when the shock was still palpable, when no-one knew what the outcome would be. When President Zelenskyy said that he didn’t need a ride, he needed ammunition when offers of evacuating him from Kyiv were made.

On the Sealion Press forums, a number of us wondered what we, as fiction writers, could do to help. The UK Charity Disasters Emergency Committeehad set up an appeal to give humanitarian support to the people of Ukraine, and we wanted to contribute to this. But we also wanted to do something, a gesture in addition to simply giving money. It took us, fiction writers all, a couple of days to realise we could write a book, with the proceeds going to the appeal.

Since I had a publishing company, I offered to edit and publish the book.

At the time, no-one knew what the immediate future held, and there was a general feeling that things would be decided very quickly. As a result, we felt under time pressure. OK, our predictive abilities were a little lacking on this occasion, but in our defence, that was also true of people and organisations with rather more resources and access to information than we had.

Which meant I burned through a whole bunch of favours and contacted as many people as I could who I knew could be relied on to produce stories quickly. Someone suggested that it would be easier to get writers and buyers if the theme was to focus on the reconstruction and humanitarian work that would be necessary.

Since the writers involved were all in the field of speculative fiction, that presented an obvious theme: Building a Better Future.

Twenty-one days later, the anthology was published. Like I said, everyone at the time felt things were time-critical. On such a short timescale, a lot of the editorial decisions were snap decisions rather than carefully considered ones. Which, as you will appreciate, made planning the flow of the anthologystressful.

I had an idea of the general flow that I wanted; Andy Cooke had the first part of a novel (Skyborn, now published in fulla cracking tale of airships, post-apocalypse, small modular nuclear reactors, and teenage romance) that fitted with the theme that he was willing to trial, and which made for a good closing piece. Then Dennis Fyke submitted a piece about Holodomor, which I felt was a good piece to be up near the front.

Day by day, I had progress from stories and from the cover artist. And day by day, I outlined a brief synopsis of progress on the SLP forum. The reason for this latter was to ensure that each day I had progress to report. Pressure, pressure. That’s what being an editor is all about.

When it was all complete and the book became available, I breathed a huge sigh of relief, and uttered the heart-felt words: “Never again!”

You know what’s coming, don’t you.

One year later, with the war still ongoing, and the news of the various devastations, it felt time to do another anthology.

This time, however, I had the sense not to try and get it produced, start to finish, in 21 days. The theme I chose was “Ten Years Later,” and in my briefing to people, I emphasised this theme. While BABF was largely an expression of determination, a refusal to submit, this had a greater emphasis on hope. I was able to get what I think was a nice flow to the stories, with the theme of each story leading in to the next. I was very happy with the various submissions that I accepted.

Some submissions weren’t quite suitable for the developing structure, and had to be rejected. That’s the part of being a publisher and editor that I find the hardest. Telling someone that a perfectly good story hasn’t made the cut because of a structure that I’ve imposed on the anthology. I hate giving people bad news like that.

The spread of authors was wider this time; the production was slicker. And it was certainly a lot less stressful. I think putting the speculation onto a solid basiswhat will things be like in ten years gave authors a greater focus, and the feeling of hope shines through. Oh, certainly the hope will be tarnished with the cost of getting there, but it is palpable in many of the stories. Alex Wallace and Andy Cooke both looked at the reconstruction that will be needed for the social divisions within Ukraine and between Ukraine and Russia. Jason Sharp takes a long, hard look at the issues of PTSD that people will face.

The anthology was a delight to put together, and I remain very pleased with the outcome. It brought home to me the truism that whatever is good in an anthology is the credit of the relevant author, and whatever is bad in an anthology is the fault of the editor. That’s what an editor of an anthology does: they create the opportunity for the authors to shine. If the author doesn’t shine, then the editor chose the wrong story, or presented it in the wrong way, or didn’t give the author the right guidance, or made a mess of the order and the flow of the whole. And if the author does shine, then the author deserves all the credit. That’s as it should be.

The bottom line of these anthologies is quite simple; it’s the bottom line. BABF generated just over £1000 for the DEC Ukraine appeal, TYL just under £1000. I’m a little disappointed that it wasn’t more, but as a small publisher, I only have a very modest marketing budget.

So, what is next on the horizon for you, personally, and for Sergeant Frosty Publications? And where and how is the best way for readers and fans to contact and meet you?

As you’ve probably worked out, while I often make plans, life has a way of chuckling and throwing a curve ball to totally disrupt things. Well, I have plans, but what life has in mind remains to be seen.

I’ve restarted working (at the age of 71) as a Learning Support Assistant at a local Junior school (for ages 8-11). This basically involves me listening to children as they read, and I read to them. Oh, there’s a lot more involved, obviously, but the school (and my teacherI say “my teacher” because I seem to get awfully protective of young adults nearly half a century younger than I am doing a job I could never do) seems quite keen for me to pass on writing tips to the children.

Which means I get to test out new stories on a captive audience always keen to give feedback.

That’s probably going to end in my shifting from writing for young adults (which had been the bulk of what I had been doing) to writing for a somewhat younger readership. Which will present its own challenges.

I’ve heard it said that writing for children is easier than writing for adults, because you aren’t drawing on such a wide vocabulary and sentences generally have a simpler structure. That’s not my experience. For a start, pacing is a much more critical matter. Once you lose the attention of the audience, it’s gone.

It’s harder than it seems. Apparently simple things often are. Chekhov’s Gun most definitely applies. If something appears, the young reader will expect it to be there for a purpose, and (I cannot emphasise this enough) They Will Remember.

Which is a rather long-winded way of saying I’m moving to writing more stories aimed at the 8-11 age range. There’s Sheriff Pat, who’s a brontosaurus who is the sheriff in a western setting; there’s the Three Wise Toys, about some toys who decide to give their child a Christmas present; there’s a reworking of Escape From The Tower and of Pwff y Ddraig Hud.

Clearly, I’m having a lot of fun with these.

As for how people can contact me, that’s easy. At the bottom of the Sergeant Frosty homepage, there’s an e-mail address that will get through to me. I can’t promise how quickly I’ll respond—life tends to be fairly busy.

Thank you so much, David!


POSTED BY: Paul Weimer. Ubiquitous in Shadow, but I’m just this guy, you know? @princejvstin.

Review: The Cautious Traveller's Guide to the Wastelands, by Sarah Brooks

$
0
0

An eerie exploration of the dangers of mimicry and control, on the Trans-Siberian Express

Cover design by Steven Marking, illustration by Rohan Eason

I was at Worldcon this last weekend, and one of the panels—'Monster Theory’—discussed at length a certain tension pervading all dark, scary things that go bump in the night: Who, really, is the monster here? As the panellists agreed, if we treat the monstrous as a metaphorical extension of the dark parts of ourselves (and we usually do), then the most natural revelation follows that the real monsters were the humans we met along the way.

Externalizing all that is dark and scary about ourselves is a fundamentally human way of interacting with the world—not a nice way, to be sure, but relatable. We’d much rather invent an other to embody all the bits of ourselves that we don’t want to acknowledge; and out of the soup of self-loathing (or, if you prefer, clear-eyed understanding of human weakness), dripping and eerie, emerge works of insight, including Sarah Brooks' excellent tale of train horror, The Cautious Traveller’s Guide to the Wastelands.

The year is 1900, and the iron rails rule the Eurasian continent. Distances are shorter than ever before; imperialism unites the world; commerce is king; and The Company will let nothing stand in the way of its drive to unite Beijing and Moscow through its Trans-Siberian railway. Only, in this history, Siberia is not as amenable to ferrous conquest as it proved to be in other timelines. In this history, in the preceding century, Siberia turned weird. Villages disappeared. Refugees told tales of horrors taking their place, horrors followed them, creeping outward. Japan closed its borders. China moved the Great Wall. Russia built a wall.

But The Company is unafraid. The Company will conquer the Siberian Wastelands. The Company built a railway, and runs a train, and by God and King and Country, nothing will prevent this train from making its 15-day crossing. Not the strange creatures that can be seen out the windows during the crossing; not the odd effects of the crossing on the passengers; and certainly not the engineers and train crew who report with increasing desperation that the repeated crossings are changing things.

This book is about one such crossing of the train. Tensions are high in the wake of a previous crossing in which something went badly wrong—something that none of the passengers or crew can quite remember. Marya is the daughter of the engineer who designed the window-glass that shattered on that last crossing, and who died shortly afterwards, under odd circumstances. She wants to know what happened. Next is Grey, a British naturalist, who is determined to uncover the secrets of the Wastelands and display them at the Great Exhibition in Moscow, because how dare nature resist the conquest of science? Finally, we have Weiwei, an adolescent who was born on a previous crossing. For reasons of jurisdiction and expediency, she was de facto adopted by the train crew upon being orphaned shortly after birth, and lives and works on it as her only home. Over the course of this crossing, all three pursue their own agendas, which naturally produce conflict—but not so much with each other as with the larger powers controlling the train inside and the Wastelands outside.

The details of unfolding events are less memorable than the details of setting and vibes, which are provided in lush profusion. The Company is determined to offer its passengers (in first class, at least) comfort, luxury, and the overwhelming impression of security, confidence, and control in the face of the uncontrollable weirdness outside. But the price of that control is a claustrophobic denial of reality. Passengers close the curtains of their windows rather than face what confronts them outdoors, chasing the false security of mundane civilization.

This false security reflects an important theme of the book: the psychology of control. The Company aims to control everything—the crossing; the Wastelands; heck, the world too, while it’s at it. Grey wants to control knowledge and nature. Although he presents himself, and indeed thinks of himself, as a scientist seeking to understand, it is not enough for him to understand the Wastelands on their own terms. Rather, he aims to force the Wastelands into his own framework of understanding, distorting them so they fit in with what he believes he knows about the natural world. Except the Wastelands are not knowable in that way, because they are not natural in that way. These attempts at control are doomed to failure; reality will assert itself, in whatever weird and uncanny way best suits the version of reality outside the closed and curtain train windows.

But not immediately. For a while you can pretend that everything is fine, is normal, is under control. Because that is another theme in this book: mimicry, the ability to look like something that you’re not. Nothing is as it seems, inside or out. Humans on the train cloak themselves in false identities, and Wasteland entities take on human-inspired forms. Odd, massive earthworm things move along beside the train, imitating the shapes of the cars as they hump through the ground. For all its luxuries, the train is not safe; the Wastelands will not go away, no matter how many panes of glass and curtains are interposed; and The Company is not in control.

Yet these mimicries—of safety, security, control, civilization—are only half of the picture. When passengers close the curtains and drink cocktails, they are pretending that something strange and dangerous is in fact safe. But mimicry can go in the opposite direction, too. Early on, Grey contemplates hoverflies, syrphidae, which camouflage themselves as bees. They are weak, and so adopt the form of the strong for protection. They are something harmless trying to look like something dangerous.

So: which type of mimicry are the Wastelands engaging in, when its exponents take on human-inspired forms? Are they something dangerous that humans are invited to see as safe (or, at least, controlled)? Or are they something that, for their own protection, must take on the form of something more dangerous? Who, really, is the source of the monstrous in this tale?

Well, another panel at Worldcon—about the purposes of reviewing books—had some divided opinions about whether spoilers should be avoided. I believe they should be, and so I will not answer that question. But perhaps, if your own preferences fall on the other side of the line, you can guess what my answer would be.


Highlights

Nerd coefficient: 8/10, well worth your time and attention

  •     Eerie, creepy, otherworldly Siberia
  •     Locked trains
  •     Mimicry

Reference:  

Brooks, Sarah. The Cautious Traveller's Guide to the Wastelands [Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2024].

CLARA COHEN lives in Scotland in a creaky old building with pipes for gas lighting still lurking under her floorboards. She is an experimental linguist by profession, and calligrapher and Islamic geometric artist by vocation. During figure skating season she does blather on a bit about figure skating. She is on Mastodon at wandering.shop/@ergative.

The October Daye ReRead: The Brightest Fell

$
0
0

Welcome back, dear readers. Today we’re going to revisit the eleventh novel in Seanan McGuire’s October Daye series: The Brightest Fell. We continue to push towards catching up with publication, which is frankly going to make the reread a little bit weird (or, realistically, just finish it). I was just looking at my writeup of A Red Rose Chain, where I wrote “nine down, seven to go” and now I’m writing “eleven down, seven to go” after McGuire published two October Daye books last year. It’s hard out here for a rereader.

With that said, it doesn’t look like there will be a new novel this year, which will mark the first year since Seanan McGuire started publishing novels that there will not be a new entry in the series. McGuire has published seventeen novels in this series alone (let alone everything else). She deserves a break if she wants one. I hope this was McGuire’s choice. At a minimum, this provides a greater opportunity for me to get closer to catching up (or it would if it didn't take me seven months to get here after writing about Once Broken Faith in January).

The Brightest Fell begins the Simon Torquill rehabilitation project, which is not something I was down for the first time I read the book. I maybe didn’t feel as strongly as Sylvester, but I wasn’t here for Simon to be redeemed, and man, this is a JOURNEY. It all starts here when Toby and Sylvester wake him from being elfshot in order to further Toby’s quest to find her decades-long-lost sister August.

Simon is an absolute tragedy.

Before the tragedy, though, I should note that we’re going to get deeper into spoilers than the broadest outlines of what The Brightest Fell is about.

Amandine is the absolute worst, as has been previously noted, and unfortunately returns in The Brightest Fell to transform and force-lock Tybalt and Jazz into their animals forms as an impetuous to compel Toby to undertake a quest to find and return Toby’s decades-long-lost sister August. She’s just a terrible mother / person / Firstborn / everything. Amandine, that is.

”What I did, I did for the best of reasons. That doesn’t forgive it. If anything, that makes it worse, that a good man might become a villain thinking himself a hero in his heart. Take care, October. Your current quest . . . this is the road that broke me.”

Simon is a surprisingly thoughtful character, and while I can’t speak for all readers, I can say that I wasn’t prepared by the depth of pathos Simon evokes in this novel. He was such a hated character, and the absolutely amazing feat that McGuire pulls off is making me give a shit about him. Simon was the monster. But August is Simon’s daughter with Amandine, and all of Simon’s actions, his entire motivation, is to find his daughter. Everything he did to bind himself to Eira / Evening was in service to bringing his daughter home. Every horror Simon unleashes, every terrible action was to save his child.

That’s relatable.

It excuses nothing, and Simon doesn’t ask for excusal or forgiveness here. It does explain so much.

It also makes the heartbreak of the ending hit so much harder. Simon’s going to become a villain again? Well, he’s been one. But after everything he did and all his work to become a better man no longer under the influence of Eira to reclaim his humanity (or, at least his true core self, not being a human and all) is about to be gone in service of actually and finally saving August.

”I understand why you want to do this, but I don’t think you know how much ground you’ll lose. You smell of apples again, Torquill. What my sister did to you is going to leave scars, but you might get to be your own man again if you stay free, if you keep heading for home. Don’t you want that?”

“With all my heart,” he said.

His voice broke. So did my heart. There is a brief scene when August gets to see and remember her father and find “home” and not be so desperately lost as she’s so frustratingly been for most of the book. This is absolutely wrenching because Simon knows what he is giving up in exchange and August doesn’t.

Toby and Simon do rescue August, but the only way to bring August all the way back —because magic has a price— is that Simon has to trade his decency and his memories for August’s. His daughter will find herself and Simon will be back to the full-throated villain he was when he was at his worst and will have no memory of any of his gains and recovery.

What an absolute tragedy.

What an amazing experience where McGuire can make the re-fall of one of the worst of her villains (thus far) so touching and painful. I still don’t like Simon Torquill, but I can empathize with and understand him better.

Random Notes:

”Stacy jumped up onto the stage without waiting for the DF to say anything, grabbing the microphone.”

As always, Stacy’s presence hits different now that I know. Does the Luidaeg know? We’ve got a few books to go, but the loss of Stacy and Toby’s friendship will be heartbreaking.

“Oh, sweet Titania, no.”

That just reads differently than we knew at the time (also, “Sweet” Titania?). This is also in reference to Toby being forced to sing karaoke at her bachelorette party. Also, the Luidaeg sings “Poor Unfortunate Souls” and it is a thing of absolute wonder even though we can’t actually hear it. But we kind of can, right?

”I’ll help you with Rayseline’s defense no matter what, Sylvester; you only ever had to ask me,” I said, fighting to keep my voice level. “But I need Simon now, and I need you, my liege, to help me. Will you help me?”

I really hope one of the next Toby novels will get a chance to delve more into her revised relationship with Rayseline and how that changes from this point on. What began as a broken cartoon character is slowly becoming a far more interesting one as the series progresses, though we don’t have a lot to work with.

Also, the conclusion to The Brightest Fell is part of Sylvester (Toby’s liege lord and father figure) pushing further and further away from Toby. This time not because of breaking her trust as he did in the past, but because Toby’s restoration of Villain Simon means Sylvester is pulling in to his family, and despite what he has said in the past, that doesn’t actually include Toby. I hesitate to exactly say fuck Sylvester, because it makes sense to a point, but kind of fuck Sylvester anyway.

Bonus fun: a “Cats Laughing” shirt makes an appearance, which is a real-world Minnesota-based band featuring writers Emma Bull and Steven Brust, among others.

Next up in the reread will be Night and Silence, in which Toby's former family is not quite forgotten—with a bonus history lesson.

Open roads and kind fires, my friends.

Previous Rereads

Nerds of a Feather is a 2024 Hugo Award Winner!

$
0
0
Team NoaF on stage! Photo by Aidan Joy

We are overjoyed to accept the 2024 Hugo Award for Best Fanzine! Thank you so much to everyone who read and voted in the category—and to all of the other finalists. This is our second Hugo award as a zine, and we cannot adequately convey how much that recognition means to us. Thank you.

As in 2021, following a practice started by File 770 and Lady Business, we will be recusing ourselves from consideration in the fanzine category in 2025. Best Fanzine has been won by a different publication every year since 2014, and we think that variety is a strength of the category and a testament to all of the brilliant zines, online and paper, that are being published today. By stepping aside, we hope to allow other voices to have their chance in this category, and we're looking forward to cheering everyone on from the sidelines!

Our speeches at the ceremony were given by Roseanna Pendlebury and Adri Joy. Below, you can find the text of those speeches, as well as thanks from our other editors (except Joe Sherry, who is currently touring Scotland with limited internet but conveys his excitement, appreciation and joy in a similar way to 2021)

The NoaF team at the Hugo awards. Photo by Olav Rokne

Roseanna Pendlebury
Before Adri gets to the bulk of our speech, I want to add my own personal thank you to my partner Ed, who found out Nerds of a Feather were asking for volunteers and told me to apply, as he consistently has for so many opportunities I've gone for. He did the hard bit, I just did the reviewing and editing. Also to every member of the reviewing community that our work exists in conversation with, because reviews could never exist in a vacuum.

Adri Joy
I want to give a personal thank you to my parents for being here today, taking the long trip up from Cambridgeshire in the motorhome with two dogs to see their daughter in a jellyfish hat winning a science fiction award. Thank you, I love you, this wouldn't have happened without you. Thank you to my online communities, especially Sparkle Rocket, the Cannibal Cult and the Subjective Chaos gang, for being amazing, supportive and always having the right opinions even when they're also very wrong.

I want to thank the Nerds of a Feather team: fellow editors Joe, Arturo, Paul and Roseanna, founders G and Vance and our 2023 contributors: Alex Wallace, Ann Michelle Harris, Chris Garcia, Clara Cohen, Dean E.S. Richard, Elizabeth Fitzgerald, Haley Zapal, Joe Del Franco and Phoebe Wagner. You're all amazing, and this award is for all of you.

I want to use this platform to note that we are gathered here in Glasgow at a time of particular national shame for the UK. Decades of xenophobic, racist, anti-Muslim rhetoric in this county have now spilled over into far-right violence and pogroms against refugees and migrants in many cities, especially in England and Northern Ireland, fuelled by misinformation and hate speech from political elites.

I think everything we do as creators and fans of SFF is political, and I'm proud to be part of SFF fan communities that stand opposed to that kind of hatred, and which seek to promote diversity and redress historic imbalances—however small and imperfect our efforts may be. I take this award as a challenge to recommit to action, to push back against racism, xenophobia, transphobia and marginalisation in all its forms, in whatever small ways I can make a difference.

I invite you all to do the same.

Vance K
When I think of the evolution of SFF and its attendant fandom over the 12(!) years that we have been publishing this fanzine, I feel a tremendous sense of gratitude to the creators and critical voices that have shaped that evolution. A million folks that are a lot savvier than I am have already pointed out that one of the jobs of SFF fiction is to imagine better possible worlds, but it's up to us here in real life to try to make them happen. I know that as an individual and as a fan, my life is better in concrete ways because of the efforts of so many across this community to promote inclusiveness and visibility for individuals and groups that have traditionally not had that visibility or advocacy in the past.

So I am profoundly thankful that Nerds of a Feather, Flock Together continues to be a place that gets to be a part of that ongoing conversation and evolution. This site began as two guys in Los Angeles who enjoyed talking about their respective nerdy passions. That it has grown over the years to include the work of over two dozen regular contributors, provide an outlet for many, many more guest contributors, champion the work of hundreds of new and established writers and creators, and develop an astonishingly capable and dedicated editorial team (the best anywhere, if you ask me) is a source of pride and deep gratitude. So much of that gratitude goes to Adri, Joe, Arturo, Paul, and Roseanna. They picked up the baton and grew the site into what it has become—WHICH IS A TWO-TIME HUGO AWARD WINNER!!!!

Thank you so much to the readers, the Hugo voters, and the community that engages with these posts and the works that they are in conversation with. And, of course, thank you to The G, who pitched me this whole idea those many years ago.

The G
Nerds of a Feather was born at an intensely stressful moment in my life, when I was frankly struggling to stay above water. I needed something joyful to pour my heart into, but also knew I couldn't do it alone. I called Vance and pitched an idea to him—a blog about books and films. He then suggested we bring a couple more folks on, so the blog would stay fresh, fun and exciting for us (and not turn into a slog). Many years later, and thanks to the contributions of the more than 25 writers who have spent time as part of our flock, Nerds of a Feather is now a two-time Hugo Award winner. Most of all, though, this award is a testament to the superb team of editors and writers we have right now—who continue to make this twelve-year-old blog fresh, fun and exciting five-days-a-week, fifty-two-weeks-per year.

To echo Adri's words, I also want to note that we've reached an important moment in time, when many of the most pessimistic predictions of science fiction seem to be coming true. From climate disaster and under-regulated artificial intelligence to corporate capture of government and the re-emergence of small-minded, chauvinistic nationalisms, we live in a world that desperately needs speculative thinking—new ways of imagining the reality we live in. Part of our mission at Nerds of a Feather is to engage with that thinking, while also celebrating works that bring us joy and escape at moments of great anxiety. I could not be more proud to be a part of this community, and to see the work of my wonderful colleagues recognized by Hugo voters.

Arturo Serrano
It was fortunate that my presence on Twitter during its last good times coincided with a call for volunteers at Nerds of a Feather in early 2021. I have my amazing husband, Tucker Lieberman, to thank for the revelation that Twitter was where the literary scene gathered and put their brains together. That precious place is now lost in the inconstant whirlwind of the internet.

There are many other happy coincidences to feel grateful for. The fact that I used the coronavirus quarantine to binge all the Star Trek that existed. The fact that I stumbled upon Jules Verne at my high school library. The fact that an exile from the Ottoman Empire chose Colombia to settle in and went on to found the academy where I learned English. I imagine countless potential timelines where I didn't end up joining a team that won a Hugo.

I have to thank Coral Alejandra Moore for giving me my first contact with the English-speaking science fiction community at the short-lived Constelación magazine. That was the start of an unpredictable journey that some days I can't believe has happened to me. Also thanks to Clay Harmon, Michael David Lukas and Rodrigo Bastidas for believing in my writing. Thanks to Alex Wallace for his enthusiastic support, and for putting me in contact with more awesome people. Thanks to Tamara Gutiérrez, María Teresa Osorio, Pilar Sáenz and Daniel Monje for keeping alive Cienciaficcionarios, the most important science fiction association in Bogotá. Thanks to Felipe López and Angélica Caballero for their inspiring perseverance in promoting science fiction in a country that barely reads. Thanks to Jaime Espinal and Juan Gabriel Vásquez for their good wishes.

And thanks to all the Hugo voters around the world who gave this award to our little website with basically zero budget but lots of passion.

Paul Weimer
I am delighted that, back in 2017, NOAF came to me and asked me to be their representative in Helsinki that year, since none of the team could go. That led me to eventually joining the team myself, and subsequently becoming one of the editors. And so here we are. Thanks to you, NOAF for making me part of your flock. 

I would like to thank all of our readers for being enthusiastic and recognizing the value of our work, and the mission of our work. We are in the liminal space between writers and readers (some of us also being the former, and all of us being in the latter). If I was Kamala Harris, I'd have a Venn diagram to explain this all. I will be mysterious and also like to thank someone very special whom circumstances and the realities of the online world will not let me name. They have been an absolute rock for me, and their support of me invaluable. Thanks to them, and thanks to all. 

What it looks like when you win a Hugo! Photo: Paul Weimer



Interview with John Wiswell

$
0
0

The Locus and Nebula winner spoke with Nerds of a Feather about his writing process, the varieties of horror, and why some monsters just want to be friends

Arturo Serrano: You seem to have created a solid niche for yourself as the writer who sympathizes with the monsters. Do you apply the same approach to classic monster stories? Do you look for an angle to empathize with Dracula or the xenomorphs?

John Wiswell: One of the things that compels me to write Fantasy and Science Fiction is finding the unexplored angles in worlds. We love rigorous worldbuilding that thoroughly explains what it is to live as a special hero or an average person in a fantastical world. But whose stories aren't told? Whose perspective is erased? This certainly extends to classic monster stories. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein's creature is infamously sympathetic. But what is the life of a wraith trapped at a summer camp forever? The locals say that the shapeshifting lump at the bottom of the well is out to kill all humanity, but what is its point of view? How do we look through different eyes? That's fundamentally compelling to me, especially as someone who has spent most of his life feeling barely human. It's an invitation to care. And that is a great place for a story to begin.

AS: Do you generally come up with the plot first and then the monster, or the monster first and then the plot?

JW: The funny thing about monsters is I usually conceive them with contexts. Without a context, a dragon is just a dragon. Smaug has to have stolen the dwarves' home mountain and terrorized the lake men to be a monster. So when I created someone like Shesheshen for Someone You Can Build A Nest In, I immediately conceived of her as a shapeshifting creature trying not to blow her shot at a relationship with a wholesome nerd. When I created 133 Poisonwood Avenue for "Open House on Haunted Hill," it was simultaneously a haunted house, and a lonely one that was willing to be gentle and caring if a family would stay in it. The context of the creature tends to be part of its essence, for me. Their claws and fangs are just as important as their insecurities.

AS: As someone who'd rather hug the monsters than slay them, what do you actually find scary?

JW: The U.S. healthcare system.

AS: Your stories tend to have elaborate, poetic titles. Do you have a process for choosing titles?

JW: My approach is pretty simple! I'll open a text document, or live out the cliche of turning over an envelope to make a list. And then I will simply keep writing down title ideas, no matter how bad they are. The goal is to keep going. Do permutations on the same idea. Swap a blander or spicier verb in. Flip the syntax. If a wild idea comes up, write it down. Sometimes the very first title is perfect (Someone You Can Build A Nest In was the first title I had in mind for my book, and I never wanted to change it). Other times I'll have a screen full of titles that I think are all terrible, and only upon rereading it will I realize the thirteenth is the lucky one (this happened with "For Lack of a Bed" and "I'll Miss Myself"). The process works because it makes me get out of my own way, by forcing me to accept anything my internal critic might normally block.

AS: What is your process, as an aromantic writer, for putting yourself in the mental space of a character who is in love?

JW: I don't mean to disparage my alloromantic friends, but it is not hard to pick up on how romance works because it's ubiquitous. Sexuality and romance dominate this culture. It's in so many books, the subject of so many albums, so many advice columns, so many podcasts, so many weepy diatribes on stoops, so many embarrassing arguments people have on speaker phones in the dairy aisle... So if you're aromantic like me? You've probably heard about love already. And many aromantic writers still find romance interesting on one level or another, because it matters to people we care about, or because of some narrative hook. You know, some of my best friends are alloromantic! [Laughs] For me, a character's love arc comes from them organically. Many of my short stories have no love plots. My next novel has a little romance to it, but it's not central. Whereas in this book, for who Shesheshen was, how self-reliant she was, for how alone she was in the world and who she'd meet, for the toxic ideas of romance she was carrying and the growth that would require from her, it was purely natural that a huge part of her book would be a love story. I entered that mental space the same way she did: wary, confused, afraid she'd be hurt, and unable to not hope for the best. Because I cared about this character for all the other reasons in her life, I could go on that journey. And similarly I could go on that journey because of what it said about the need for companionship. What is said in a story can be as important as the characters. Sometimes you find yourself just wanting to write a supportive, loving married couple because you see so few of them in media and want to balance things out. Sometimes you want to capture how we change internally in relation to how we change with other people. I don't have to fall in love to understand change. I just have to care for all the people in my life who do. If I didn't care for those real people in my life, then I couldn't write anything.

AS: Last time we interviewed you, you described your creative process as "I eat darkness, and then spit out rainbows." Could you describe how that metabolism works?

JW: Ha! I love that way of posing this question. And it's a fair question. So I have a copy of Tananarive Due's The Reformatory. I'm excited to read it. I don't know what it's about, because Due is a great writer and I just trust her to deliver something that is good on its own terms. When I have the free time to read something that big, I'll take it off my shelf, and just read it, and discover its characters and premise and twists. I've heard it's in the region of Horror, if not a pure Horror novel, so I'll be ready for that sort of experience. And if it works on me, I'll enjoy the parts that work. The tone, the atmosphere, the character psychology, the social ramifications, the weird creeping things in the walls—whatever is there. But I'll also find myself wishing I could help the characters. Perhaps in mediating their fights. Perhaps in being able to stop by the side of the road when their car breaks down. Some things meant to be scary will inevitably be funny, because I'm not the one experiencing them. Some will be so shocking that they'll have a funny dimension, because shock and humor are similarly electric impulses. Things will spark. Some parts will be so grim that I'll ponder how light would change our understanding. Inevitably, I'll turn the story around in my mind, to look at it from imagined angles. Maybe that will mean I'll sympathize with a ghost or a werewolf, who to me reads as misunderstood. Or maybe it will mean I'll consider how some people taking responsibility rather than shunning it would change things, or imagine how different people's contexts would change the series of events. How could life bend towards justice? Towards empathy? Towards another end? None of this will diminish the book. Again, this is presuming the book is good, but when isn't a Due book good? They've all rocked so far. But if the book is good, considering it from angles that it doesn't consider will help me appreciate its structure and what it achieves. Meanwhile I'll carry a charge of inspiration, for how other worlds could treat people. I'll be pondering, and probably cackling, and reaching to read the next book on my list after The Reformatory. And then the next book, and the next. After enough books, and short stories, and movies, all of that fictional darkness will be counterpointed by enough light from my other angles that refraction is inevitable. And then I'll be writing something wholly different, while loving what everyone else made. That is the metabolism.

AS: You've sometimes shared details with the public about your lifelong experience with chronic pain. How does your day-to-day negotiation with your body inform your writing about characters with nonconventional anatomies?

JW: It's predisposed me for that, for sure! I have to be mindful of my body in ways other people aren't, and I've normalized awful pain, and exhaustion, and having conversations when I have brain fog. My body has turned on me in so many ways over my lifetime. I think that's also why I call some of my work Fantasy where other people see it as Body Horror. They see it from the outside, whereas to me, it's something more routine. It's a fun schism to discuss with readers.

AS: You've also spoken about the ways books saved your life. What do you hope your books will do for young readers today?

JW: It would be too much to ask that my stories save their lives, too, right? [Laughs] But my stories have already started to do what I hoped. A couple years ago I spoke on a panel about how being asexual makes some of us feel monstrous because we don't give people what they want, and afterward a young reader came up to me in tears because hearing me say that made her feel less alone. Since then I've seen an uptick in comments and emails from readers who have been in terrible times, and who felt companionship with my characters that helped them through their burdens. If a story can be there for someone when things are terrible? If it can make them feel less alone, even for an hour? Then I haven't just given someone a gift. They've given me a gift, by hanging in there, reading and fighting. I couldn't ask for more.

AS: Horror still has an ableism problem. What ways of symbolizing evil that don't fall back on the demonization of bodily deformities would you like to see in horror stories?

Beauty, handsomeness, and attractiveness are so underrated as villain traits. Historically they're tapped into for conveying a disliked group (gay-coded sexy vampires) or as a facade (Patrick Bateman looks put together, but is yet another evil "crazy" guy). I think depicting more antagonists as the beautiful, not as lust objects, but as people who feel they are above normal people physically, who wear the most expensive clothing, whose presentation drips of class that is unattainable by their victims, could do some powerful things. More damage is done to our world by people in designer suits than people in hockey masks.

AS: You take monsters and turn them into cuddly lovable characters. How do you feel about the ongoing trend of taking cuddly lovable characters (e.g. Winnie the Pooh) and turning them into monsters?

I feel like Horror has been turning lovable things into scary things for far longer than I've been turning a few monsters sympathetic. How many classic and pop songs do we have to hear slowed down and turned creepy before that becomes funny? How many children's toys have been smeared with blood, from Chucky to Annabelle to M3GAN? Clowns, who dedicate their lives to inspiring mirth, are the stuff of nightmares thanks to Pennywise and the Joker. Horror in particular has always sought to subvert what we're comfortable with in order to explore discomfort, and inequity, and the vulnerability of taking anything for granted. One of my favorite movies is Jaws, which is really just a great way to ruin the hobby of swimming for yourself. [Laughs] I love this stuff when it's done well, so long as we mind our biases. For instance, again I enjoy Jaws, but I deplore how it's inspired shark fishing. In Humans Vs. Sharks, we are decidedly the actual monsters.

AS: For your own reading, do you prefer science fiction that warns "let's not do this" or that offers "here's what we could do"?

"Let's not do this" is the standard formula for SciFi Horror, and I won't say I haven't read and watched plenty of that. Give me another techno-monster hunting its own engineers and I'll probably read it. Whereas "here's what we could do" inspires resistance and rebellion against tyranny. I thought it was so funny when YA Dystopias took off, and some of the old guard said they'd ruined dystopian fiction by giving the protagonists the opportunity of winning. But isn't that what we've needed? Stories of warning us against authoritarianism can't fully inoculate us against it ever happening. So we have stories of possibility in conflict, and of encouragement to not lie down and submit. In this way, I don't see the two flavors as in competition, so much as they both encourage kinds of vigilance.

AS: What stories have you read or watched that you think have done monsters right?

Well, there are many ways to get monsters right. John Ajvide Lindqvist's Let the Right One In is one of my favorite Horror novels, and Eli is one of my favorite vampires. There is such powerful loneliness on display throughout that book, and the yearning for connection. But I wouldn't say Eli is the only way to write a vampire. The film 30 Days of Night is pretty darned intense and fun in its own way. John Fawcett's film Ginger Snaps does werewolves in a gruesome and fun way, although you could balance that with Mamoru Hosoda's Wolf Children, which is both charming and aching in its depiction of two werewolf cubs growing up with a human mother struggling to keep them safe. It's all about the angle of the story. John Gardner's Grendel is a crackling fun read that humanizes the monster from Beowulf, and makes his story not just tragic, but funny. And I'll never turn down a chance to rewatch Tremors.

AS: What are you reading these days?

JW: I'm halfway into Park Seolyeon's A Magical Girl Retires, which is a chewy little book about a heroine struggling with the desire to step away from the adventuring life. It riffs on the conventions of the Magical Girl genre, which I have a big soft spot for after watching so much Sailor Moon and Card Captor Sakura when I was younger. Before that, I just finished Vajra Chandrasekera's The Saint of Bright Doors, which you already know is one heck of a book. And I just got my copy of Arkady Martine's novel Rose/House, which I'm terrifically excited to start. Martine is such a splendid writer that I am sure she'll have a sparkling take on haunted houses in the era of smart homes. That is probably next!

Thank you, John, for taking the time for this interview.


POSTED BY: Arturo Serrano, multiclass Trekkie/Whovian/Moonie/Miraculer, accumulating experience points for still more obsessions.


Review: The Archive Undying by Emma Mieko Candon

$
0
0

A fantastical future world of giant robots, broken AIs, and brutal societies

Sunai has a problem. A lot of problems, given his true nature and role in life. And his possible relationship with an expert in AI shrines and technology, Veyadi, is just one of those thorny problems. But in a world where broken artificial intelligences, giant mecha robots and repressive city states are what the Earth has got, Sunai is going to have to deal with his problems, and the new ones engendered by an expedition that might awaken yet another AI god into an already fractious and corrupted world of them...

This is the story of The Archive Undying from Emma Mieko Candon.

Imagine a world of artificial intelligences as veritable gods, but fallible gods. Gods that can be corrupted, destroyed, changed. A world of advanced technology and hardscrabble living by the humans in the midst of gods, broken gods, mecha, and much more. It’s a tapestry rich with potential for worldbuilding.

And indeed the worldbuilding is where this novel really shines. The world Candon creates here is unpleasant in many ways. An undefined amount of time in the future (but given the utter lack of references to anything resembling our present, it’s a long time to be sure), the world appears to be a set of city-states or small polities. Artificial intelligences, in various levels of corruption or disrepair, run these city-states. Most of the states, from the implications in the novel, are much like other brutal, oppressive, hostile places that have resorted to violent control because of dangers like fragmentary portions of AI and war machines: “fragtech.” The potential of finding valuable things in shrines and in the ruins and the dangerous world outside the city-states does draw the desperate and determined, but even right in the city-state itself, fragtech can appear, and strange half-controlled mecha like the Maw. In other words, this is not a safe world, and it provides a canvas to build story and characters upon.

Speaking of mecha: My exposure to mecha (in the form of anime and manga, anyway) has been limited, and so this chance to appreciate giant robots (powered by AI, by corrupted AI, by fragtech and so forth) might be slightly wasted on me as a reader. Nevertheless, even with my limited exposure to such things, the giant robots and the conflicts and pulse-pounding action beats enthused me as a reader. This novel could be thought of as “Come for the action with giant robots, stay for the thought-provoking ideas about artificial intelligence, sentience, the uses of technology, society, and a love story all in the bargain.” And did I mention AIs?

Now imagine a fragment of one of those AIs, one Sunai, who has wound up in the Wrong Bed with the Wrong Person. He’s had a hard life, especially given that he mostly hides his true nature (who wouldn’t in this world?). The Archive Undying imagines Sunai (our primary point of view)’s life struggling to survive and persist in a world that is fascinating and precarious (even given his nature, and perhaps especially so). At the bottom of all of that worldbuilding that I’ve discussed through most of this review is the story of Sunai, his relationship with Veyadi and how they try to navigate a relationship that probably shouldn’t work, can’t work, but matters of the heart are the thorniest and prickliest things in this future world that Candon creates.

I’ve used that metaphor of thorns and prickliness a couple of times and I want to emphasize that again in the context of the social relations in the novel. People in this world have pasts and presents and intersect with each other in sharp, pointed, multidimensional ways. And while both Sunai and Veyadi are our protagonists and are definitely sympathetic protagonists at that, both of them have agendas and multiple angles to them and what they do. Where the magic really happens is in Candon throwing both men together in this relationship. I could see in the hands of another writer their relationship blowing up and falling to pieces, but that is not the story she wants to tell. But she doesn’t make it easy in the least for either of them.

There is also a clever use of point of view in the novel, showing the author’s skill and subtlety in bringing across character and theme. In addition to the primary point of view and narrative thread, Candon deploys the second person effectively in two ways. First, in bringing us some of the backstory of Sunai, and how he wound up tangled up with Veyadi and the story that unfolds in the primary narrative. And second, it helps introduce a “hidden character” to the narrative whose nature, motives and goals becomes clear as the novel moves toward its final act.1

It’s a rich and deeply interesting and immersive world that Candon has created. There are a couple of touchstones for me that came to mind. First up would be the world of The Gurkha and the Lord of Tuesday by Saad Z. Hossain. That novel imagines a future world that resonates somewhat with this one, with AIs running cities, the world outside quite dangerous to traverse, and a sense of populations bottled up with forces beyond their control in charge of them. That novel’s Kathmandu is a more pleasant place overall than the Harbor of this book, however. The Archive Undying turns the dystopian aspects of the far future setting a few notches up, and replaces myth and magic with the aforementioned mecha.

Also, I was put in mind of the Outside novels by Ada Hoffmann, which have AIs turning into gods and thus ruling the human population. That series has an interstellar feel to it, although the second novel in particular, The Fallen, mostly sticks to one broken planet, with a lot of dangers and leftovers for the humans to try and deal with even as gods and angels maneuver and scheme.

Overall, I found The Archive Undying richly and deeply detailed and a fascinating world and set of characters to visit. I do understand that more novels and stories are projected in this wildly inventive setting, and I look forward to reading them.

1. Maybe its just a recency effect, or just the luck of what I am reading, but I seem to be noticing more and more the careful and judicious use of second person tense in SFF recently. It’s never the only tense, and its use is as an added ingredient; load-bearing, but not the only thing going on. One thing that these stories seem to be exploring with the use of the second person is something that is implicit in every story that is not first person: Who is telling the story and what is their agenda and viewpoint? Second person has an intimacy in that someone is telling you what you are doing. Who that someone is (if the second person is done well) is incredibly important and can provide extra buttressing to the narrative. Candon manages that quite effectively here.

Highlights:

  • Interesting AI theology and setup

  • Fascinating use of point of view to engender intimacy in the narrative

  • GIANT MECHA

Reference: Candon, Emma Mieko.The Archive Undying [Tordotcom, 2023].


POSTED BY: Paul Weimer. Ubiquitous in Shadow, but I’m just this guy, you know? @princejvstin.

TV Review: Scavengers Reign

$
0
0

 Hopefully the move from Max to Netflix will help this fantastic series find a broader audience

Scavengers Reign is an animated sci-fi series (very much) for adults that sets up a great premise, then unfurls its surprises judiciously, dispenses its violence suddenly and shockingly, and episode-by-episode, earns its emotional pay-offs. 

When the colony ship Demeter is forced to crash land on the planet Vesta, the crew members rush into escape pods. But upon landing, they find themselves distributed across the planet’s surface, with no way to communicate with one another. With no way of knowing if any other crew members survived the crash, Azi and her robot Levi (a pair), Sam and Ursula (a pair), and Kamen (on his own) each make the decision to try to make their way back to the Demeter. Not only does it seem like the only way to survive and possibly get off of this planet, but there is also a shipload of colonists in cryosleep on board.

But the thing about Vesta is that it’s crawling with flora and fauna — and all of it, if it considers human space travelers at all, considers them food. Or worse…hosts.

Azi and Levi work well together, but when some spores get into Levi, the robot begins changing — and, profoundly. Where will this hyper-speed evolution end? Kamen, wracked with guilt over something that happened on the ship, and experiencing increasingly material hallucinations of his wife, makes a cuddly friend. But Kamen, blinded by these hallucinations, misses some…warning signs, let’s say. Sam, the oldest member of the crew, seems like he might hold Ursula back, until something about Vesta begins agreeing with his constitution. But when his ability and drive tips toward the superhuman, alarm bells begin ringing for Ursula.

And unbeknownst to any of them, the Demeter itself is facing challenges of its own. If any of the survivors manage to navigate this hostile planet and get back to the ship, what will they find when they get there?

When I was a kid, survival fiction had a big boom. I read books about kids stuck under houses, alone and bitten by rattlesnakes, stranded in the woods, stranded on a glacier, stranded on an island, you name it. My teachers characterized them as man vs. nature narratives, rather than man vs. man, or man vs. self. And they were everywhere. Gendered nouns aside, the dawning realization I had in the first episode of Scavengers Reign that this was a character vs. nature survival narrative dressed in sci-fi clothes got me very excited. But over the course of the 11 episodes, creators Joseph Bennett and Charles Huettner find ingenious ways of developing cascades of character vs. character and character vs. self arcs that build upon one another and interweave with the overarching struggle against a planet that is both indifferent to the survivors and also stunningly lethal.

The writers also seem to have done their homework on Earth creatures that use unconventional camouflage or seemingly innocuous enticements to attract prey, because there is a stunning breadth of metaphorical tripwires present on Vesta, many of which the characters are able to navigate, but some they aren't. So each time a character experiences awe at seeing some magnificent offering of a brand new world, and when they feel drawn to it, the sense of dread that began around the edges of the viewer's experience creeps ever closer to the center of the frame.

Because when characters die in Scavengers Reign, it hurts. And each time it happens, that death has broader consequences that ripple out across the narrative. As Sam says, in a line that pretty much sums up the characters' experience of Vesta, "God damn this place."

On just a storytelling level, beyond the widening narrative that continues to bring surprises, the flashback structure deployed to various degrees throughout the different episodes parcels out information just as needed, giving the viewer crucial context when it is the most meaningful and feels the least like exposition. And lest I forget, the art and animation style is gorgeous.

I could spend a lot of time exploring the symbolism and metaphorical structures that weave in and out of this show, but that's not what this review is. Instead, this review is just to encourage folks to jump in and watch, because in the notes I made to myself while watching the series, the last thing I wrote feels like a good way to sum up my overall feelings about Scavenger's Reign:

This is extraordinary science fiction.

--

Highlights

  • Compelling characters who reveal more of themselves as we spend more time with them
  • Beautiful environments and creatures that evoke Studio Ghibli in many ways, and then bend and contort them into horrors
  • A rich text that rewards re-watching and reconsidering the characters, their motivations, and their ability to accurately perceive their own situations at any given time

Nerd Coefficient: 9/10

Posted by Vance K - cult film nerd, music guy, Emmy Award-winning producer/director, and co-founder of nerds of a feather, flock together

Book Review: A Sorceress Comes to Call by T. Kingfisher

$
0
0

 A familiar, soothing balm for the soul (if the soul doesn't mind the odd bit of murder thrown in for good measure).

In every story I have read by T. Kingfisher, there is a character of a certain... well, character. She is invariably female, often older, not always the protagonist, and has about her a particular spirit that is immediately discerned - when you meet her, you know her in a heartbeat. Her situation, her backstory, her motivations may change book to book, but her fundamental substance is entirely similar, and if you had them all meet up in some sort of extra-narrative liminal space, they'd all get on like a house on fire and probably organise a trans-universe insurrection so nobody gets imperilled for the plot anymore.

In case it wasn't obvious, I love her, this character. I don't think I'd keep reading the books if I didn't, because she's so integral to all of them. But she is ubiquitous and... well... isn't this a problem? Doesn't that mean the books get a bit samey?

Which is what I want to talk about here, in regards to A Sorceress Comes to Call, T. Kingfisher's latest novel. But first, the boring bit - I should at least tell you what the book is about before I go on a wild tangent about her wider canon. The story follows two women, one, Cordelia, fourteen years old and desperately alone, abused and isolated by her mother; the other, Hester, middle aged and comfortable, living a wealthy life in the manor house of her loving if daft bachelor brother. They come into contact when Cordelia's mother, basically a professional mistress, decided that Hester's brother Samuel is a prime target for marriage and a comfortable life, from which she can set Cordelia up for success and her own advantageous betrothal. No one else in the story, save the hapless Samuel, wants this to happen and does their level best to thwart it at every turn, in spite of the quite present danger. Because Evangeline is a sorceress, and a powerful one at that, who can hold someone prisoner in their own body, turning them to her will while they watch, powerless.

It is a story about power and powerlessness, and suffering, and surviving. It's about helping those in need, recognising cruelty in the world, and the lengths people will go to in harming those around them when they get in the way of their wants and desires. And it focuses very intently on the experience of being the victim of that, using the titular sorcery to emphasise it for anyone at the back who may not have been listening the first time.

So yep, it's a jolly one...

Except, it's T. Kingfisher, so actually it kind of is, despite the murders, mutilations and intense emotional and physical abuse. 

And this is what we come back to in the familiarity of a T. Kingfisher fairytale story, and its likewise familiar characters. The moment we meet Hester, this book's designated no-nonsense woman, we know it's all going to be, approximately, ok in the end. She, like her many brethren (sistren?), is so solidly practical, so absolutely sensible, that she acts as anathema to all the crazy shit going on around her. Sure, someone's been stabbed in a melodramatic fashion, but Hester is going to be reasonable about it all. Stolid, even. It's hard to maintain horror in the face of such down-to-earth pragmatism as The Character always has.

And for me, this is the crux of what T. Kingfisher does so well in her fairytale-retelling-style books in particular - she uses the sense of the familiar, and the intensely mundane, as a contrast to the darkness and grimness that goes with certain types of story, butting up against horror as they do. I would not call them cosy fiction, because they are nothing of the sort, full of, variously, moulds and murderers and abusers. But there is comfort there nonetheless. If anything, the darkness allows the creation of the comfort because it gives The Character something to stand in contrast against - she is a source of security because she exists in opposition to the fantastical (and less fantastical) evils of the world. She says "no more", and rolls up her sleeves and tells them to get lost because she has stuff to be getting on with thankyouverymuch.

But, to come back to our question earlier, doesn't this risk them all running together and feeling samey? Yes. It absolutely does. And, sometimes, they rather do. I am reasonably sure I have mixed up some of what happens in Nettle and Bone, Thornhedge and The Seventh Bride, now that I've put them down and read other things in between. It's what has held me back from nominating those books for something like a Hugo Award - they hold themselves back from the greatest heights of memorable and thrilling and engaging and [insert positive adjectives here to suit], because they set themselves up, and set up the reader, to fit so neatly into so many expectations. But, on the flip side, they do what they do with that comfort and those expectations so incredibly well, that I will never stop seeking them out to read. The ceiling may be a little low, but the bar is very high and so very, very consistent. You know, when you pick one up, that you will receive the experience you expect, and enjoy it, be pulled along by it, be unable to put it down. Often, that is all I want.

For this particular installment, I think it also exists right at the top of the "fairytale retellings" tier of T. Kingfisher works, ahead of Nettle and Bone pretty clearly. The way it uses the magic within the setting to talk about abuse and manipulation is done extremely well, and the two viewpoint characters offer excellent foils for one another, without totally outshining the relatively large cast of secondary characters. There are genuinely chucklesome moments, some really quite horrifying imagery, unexpected geese and a slightly nonsense strategem to solve a problem. It is intensely well-crafted within the space it has set up for itself, even as that space constrains it.

If it has any flaw aside from that, it's perhaps its slightly dated attitude to men - one I am predominantly used to encountering amongst women Of A Certain Age. Most (not all, but most) of the men in the story are slightly daft, hapless but well-meaning lumps who must be directed around the plot by the competent women who hold little official power but clearly actually do everything because those silly men, couldn't possible organise anything could they? Got to let them think they're in charge, poor dears, but we'd be lost if they were actually doing the planning. On the face of it, of course, this is a mildly droll inversion of patriarchy, right? Haha hoho, isn't it funny that the women are actually the competent ones? But as soon as you examine it any more closely than that, it starts to feel a little... off. The implications that one can spin out of its assumptions aren't pleasant, and it has the same lumping-together-ness that is half of the problem of the good ol' fashioned misogyny, tying one's usefulness as a person to innate characteristics of sex. It's something I observe in people the age of... let's say my mother and upwards, and ends up being what traps them into endless life admin and the mothering of the grown ass men around them, while also being rather insulting and infantilising to the perfectly competent men who then aren't being trusted to boil and egg or put away their own socks.

But at the same time, I know, in real life, women who are like this, to a greater or lesser extent, and they are also women I am rather fond of, in spite of it all. They are women who have had to be competent in that way, because of the men who likely merited the inception of the attitude they have held onto. They just haven't quite seen that it's not everyone around them anymore. T. Kingfisher alone is not responsible for the state of shifting feminist attitudes to men, and I'd be rather unfair to pin that on her and her alone. It's just a little niggle, a vibe I see in the world and sigh a little inside to replicated in characters of whom I am also rather fond.

And so I can overlook it, for the sake of reliable comforts of the rest of the story, done with the characteristic wryness and dryness that makes her narrative voice an eternal delight. All the characters speak with their own voices (even if their accents, so to speak, are the same as the characters of her other works), and have enough about them to feel real and realised, and with genuine relationships binding them to each other, of friendship and more. The setting doesn't get anymore time than it needs, but enough to feel like a world this story and these people absolutely could exist within. All in all, it's very well put together, and retains the heart, the down-to-earth-despite-the-literal-magic core that I hope for and expect whenever I pick up one of T. Kingfisher's books. I will absolutely be rereading this in the future, on a day when I need something soothing for the soul, but with some real darkness in it to make the comfort all the more present.

--

The Math

Highlights: the usual no-nonsense T. Kingfisher older woman character we know and love; funny and distinctive tone of voice to narrative and dialogue; well explored themes of abuse and manipulation

Nerd Coefficient: 8/10

Reference: T. Kingfisher, A Sorceress Comes to Call [Titan Books, 2024].

POSTED BY: Roseanna Pendlebury, the humble servant of a very loud cat. @chloroformtea.bsky.social

Alien: Romulus is OK, and that's not OK

$
0
0

After the... ahem, headscratchable choices in the Alien prequels, a course correction was supposed to do more than rehash the exact same original formula

Unwary team visits inadvisable place. Inadvisable place has toothy critters. Toothy critters munch on unwary team. Yummy! Final girl survives. The end.

I get that many viewers were disappointed in Prometheus and Covenant, but that doesn't mean we should settle for the bare minimum. Alien: Romulus, a film burdened by the masses' anxious expectation to finally see a good Alien movie for the first time in decades, but also burdened by the curse of being plotwise an inconsequential interquel, fulfills exactly what was required of it. The problem is that it doesn't do anything beyond that. The beats of a monster/slasher/space/survival adventure are followed to the letter, the supporting characters recite their lines one by one before dutifully becoming xenomorph chow, the topic of robot rights is addressed with less lip service than plausible deniability, and characterization is kept at just enough thickness above cardboard to prevent this film from being reclassified as stop-motion.

I'm not saying Romulus doesn't have its moments. There's nothing to complain about re: visual spectacle. The shots of the characters' spaceship moving around the falling station convey a good sense of relative positions and sizes, the mandatory explosions are dosed responsibly, the interior lighting matches the emotional tone of each scene, the background planetary rings are a gorgeous sight, and the xenomorphs look as threatening as they should (even though a real-life biologist can nitpick their tendency to pose dramatically as not believably predatorlike). For the ends of a people-eating monster movie that aims to reliably jump-scare you for two hours, Romulus does the job.

But we should be asking more of an Alien movie. The themes of nature refusing to be controlled by human ambition; the fear and uncertainty inherent in motherhood; the way workplace exploitation resembles predatory violence; the impersonal cruelty of corporate calculations; the horror of forced pregnancy; the open questions about robot morality; the symbolic mirroring between the classical Marxist analysis of people alienated from their production and the franchise's repeated image of victims alienated from their reproduction—all the key preoccupations that define the Alien series are present in Romulus at the level of mere allusion without development.

The closest that Romulus gets to an interesting exploration of the canonical themes of Alien is the subplot where the robot gets a temporary upgrade with another robot's knowledge and personality. The robots aren't useful to the xenomorph breeding strategy of incubating their young inside living hosts, but having another digital consciousness in your head, supplanting your motivations and controlling your choices, comes quite close. And yet, the resolution of this subplot goes nowhere. The robot has a Blue Screen of Death, the upgrade is uninstalled, and all is back to normal. What's that I hear you mutter in grumpy tones? Character growth? Never heard of it!

As I said, the strength of Romulus is in its spectacle. But even this is delivered unevenly. There's a wonderfully tense scene near the end with xenomorph blood floating in zero gravity, but it comes immediately after a very silly fight where an entire herd of supposedly deadly xenomorphs gets dispatched in quick succession à la whack-a-mole. Soon after that, we get the predictable arrival of Chekhov's fetus and another extended fight that feels superfluous in a movie that should have ended by that point. It's a repeat of other fights we've already seen in other Alien entries.

And that's the final sin of Romulus: it's too reverent. Just like the catastrophic misfire that was The Rise of Skywalker, the Alien franchise under Disney control is now overeager to please old fans of the original movies and apologize for the audacity of the recent ones. Visual and spoken callbacks are thrown at the viewer for the instant dopamine rush, regardless of whether they make sense in their new context. And that's without getting to the ghoulish recycling of a dead actor's face with a Mummy Returns level of care.

If we don't count Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem (and by all means, let's not count it), Fede Álvarez is the first Alien director whose childhood coincided with the first Alien movies, and his attitude toward their legacy is noticeably deferential. Being a relatively younger director tasked with reviving a legendary franchise, it's understandable that he has created a cast of YA stock characters who venture into the ruins of the Nostromo expedition. As if to reinforce the point, what these newcomers find is the mess left by their predecessors' attempts to experiment with the alien.

Alien: Romulus is exactly the return to form that you demanded if you found Prometheus and Covenant blasphemous to the spirit of the franchise. But Romulus has mistaken returning to form with staying frozen inside a stasis pod.


Nerd Coefficient: 6/10.

POSTED BY: Arturo Serrano, multiclass Trekkie/Whovian/Moonie/Miraculer, accumulating experience points for still more obsessions.

Book Review: Jack Glass, by Adam Roberts

$
0
0

A structurally clever tripartite trio of space mysteries, whose culprit is known from the start without giving anything away

Cover design & illustration by Blacksheep Design

 

Adam Roberts has been on my radar for several years, now, due to his striking way with words. He’s got several blogs, one of which is mostly siloed off for reviewing SFF in an entertaining and quirky way (his discussion of Ad Astra springs to mind). He also is a dab hand at a sonnet, and has done more than one take on Ozymandias (as so many people in my internet circle seem to have done). So it’s clearly high time for me to move from sipping his literary contributions to the internet, into a big slurping quaff of his long-form fiction.

Jack Glass is, as I rather expected it would be, extremely clever. However, I was rather disappointed with several character elements. I don't usually mention flaws first, but if I get started on what this book does well I'm going to forget about them entirely. Indeed, I'm writing this paragraph last, because I thought I'd finished this review and then remembered, 'oh. . .  right' and had to go back in! So: if you like character work, you might be disappointed by this.One character is present through 2/3 of the book and yet never really does anything to justify her presence, until a very tropey reveal at the end that felt quite lazy. A different pair of characters enjoyed a relationship development was set up with a stronger foundation throughout the book, but still felt icky and wrong and weird in a way that left a bad taste in my mouth.

But! If you like structural cleverness--and, better yet, cleverness that isn't in any way smug--this book is a great ride. The structural gimmick is foundationally tripartite. The plot proceeds in three parts; each part is a whodunit, or a locked room mystery, or a prison escape. Or—as the prologue makes clear—all three at once. And, to give us even more of a head start, the whodunit is always known from the start: Titular Jack Glass is responsible for the central murder(s) in each part, in one way or another. The fun is in seeing all the bits come together.

The development of this structural conceit is, on reflection, extremely skillfully done, especially because the form of the different plot archetypes varies in overtness. In the first part, all three are easily identifiable. Jack Glass (or Jac, as he’s known in this portion), has been captured, tried, and sentenced to an 11-year prison sentence (prison story: check). The nature of this prison sentence reveals a lot about the dystopian economics of humanity’s far-future in our solar system. Humans have taken to the stars, but their existence there depends on a combination of three things: raw materials, energy, and labor. Raw materials are scarce---Earth’s exhausted, and harvesting them from asteroids is expensive. Energy is scarce and also expensive. But labor! Labor is cheap and ubiquitous. People keep on multiplying; there is no end to them; and they are always desperate. So if you want to do something cheaply, you don’t throw technology at it; you don’t throw robots at it. Technology and robots require resources: raw materials and energy. No, it’s cheaper to throw people at the job. In this timeline, AI is never going to take our jobs. Worse, the power structures are such that the vast, struggling population will be too constrained by the difficulty of not dying in space to have much hope of any sort of successful revolution or restructuring of governance. Not unless something pretty big changes . . . (hold that thought).

So: developers contract out prison labour, seal them in an asteroid (locked room: check), and come back in 11 years to see if the prisoners have managed to terraform it into a living habitat that can be sold to wealthy people who want a second home. If the prisoners have died, oh well, darn, there are plenty more where they came from. If they survive, great! Set them free, sentence served, and sell the asteroid for money. These circumstances are stressful, to put it mildly, and our small group of 7 prisoners do not deal well with the stress. Things go about as you might expect. There is conflict., bullying, madness, and eventually murder. I should mention that there is also desultory sexual assault which is treated not as a source of trauma so much as a disagreeable but unavoidable circumstance to be endured. The eventual culmination, in which Jac does indeed escape, leaving only dead bodies behind him is---no, settle down, relax, this is not a spoiler. We’re told right at the start that he’s the one whodunit (check). Anyway, even though I knew in principle what was coming, I still yelled out in horrified delight when I saw how the details worked out. I’m not entirely sure that that anatomy would work in the way described, but I also didn’t really care.

The second part shifts its perspective to a young girl, Diana Argent, about to turn 16, and one of two heirs to an extremely high-up family, one of the top echelons of governing clans. Diana is very bright, adores murder mysteries, and is having a rough time at the moment, since she’s been forced to spend some time on Earth to become re-accustomed to Earth gravity. She finds this extremely trying, raised in zero-g as she has been, so she is naturally thrilled to discover a murder (whodunit: check) amongst the servants who have accompanied her to Earth, right in their own monitored living quarters (locked room: check). A murder of her very own to solve! What fun! It plays right into her specialty, which is understanding and reading the undercurrents of relationships and motivations among people.

Diana is accompanied by her older sister, Eva, whose interests are much more esoteric. Eva is working on her 7th PhD in astrophysics, which focuses on so-called ‘champagne supernovas’, or supernovas that are extremely rare, and involve stars exploding with much more energy than their mass would seem to allow. But Eva has a sense, an idea, a hunch, that somehow this seemingly dull murder, which is clearly the result of some tedious emotional conflict among the servants, is related to her work on champagne supernovas.

And—because it’s hardly a surprise when a hint like that is dropped—I can confirm that they are related, and Jack Glass is involved. I repeat: this is not a spoiler. We know this from the start. The fun is in seeing how it all comes together. In particular, it’s interesting to see how the three plot archetypes are realized in this part. The locked-room element of the mystery is straightforward. The whodunit is a smidge shifty, and requires a bit of squinting before you can satisfy yourself how it is that Jack is responsible. But the way in which this is a prison-plot is a substantially more nebulous. One interpretation is that all of Earth, with its unbearably oppressive gravity, is a prison that Diana can’t escape. Another interpretation might equate her responsibilities to family and governance with a type of prison Or perhaps you prefer to equate the biologically enforced inequities of this world (the servants are literally drugged to love their masters) as a prison of the soul. But there is yet another interpretation, which becomes particularly salient in the third part, which I think might be the intended one.

In the last bit, Diana has joined forces with Jack. Together they are looking into the idea that something pretty big will need to change if the solar system’s power structures are going to be rearranged. Whether that something is based on technology or on people is a matter of some debate, which ties back rather nicely into the economic theory presented to us in the first part, setting the scarcity of resources and energy against the ubiquity of labor. I can’t give any real details about the culmination of this part, though, because they build on the revelations in the second part. Suffice it to say that, again, the locked room archetype is straightforward, if whimiscally futuristic; the whodunnit holds no surprises; and here the nature of the prison is undeniably identifiable, even if it is buried under a bit of philosophical interpretation.

I’m sorry to be so cryptic, but I don’t believe in spoilers. And I promise, it’s harder on me than it is on you to behave in this way. It’s actually rather maddening, because I am dying to discuss it with someone! Ping me on mastodon---my profile details are at the bottom of this review---when you’ve read the book! Let’s chat!

--

Highlights

Nerd coefficient: 7/10, an enjoyable experience, but not without its flaws

  •     Clever tripartite structure
  •     Economic dystopia
  •    Locked rooms, prison escapes, and whodunits
  •  Weaker on the characters

Reference: Roberts, Adam, Jack Glass [Gollancz, 2012].

CLARA COHEN lives in Scotland in a creaky old building with pipes for gas lighting still lurking under her floorboards. She is an experimental linguist by profession, and calligrapher and Islamic geometric artist by vocation. During figure skating season she does blather on a bit about figure skating. She is on Mastodon at wandering.shop/@ergative.

Book Review: Point of Hopes by Lisa A. Barnett and Melissa Scott

$
0
0
The first in a series of city state fantasy novels set in a fascinating and diverse world, re-released after two decades.


Back in 2018, I coined the phrase “City-State Fantasy” in a review at Reactor in discussing Sam Hawke’s City of Lies. It’s a type of fantasy of medium states, set exclusively or almost exclusively in and around a city-state, which itself is a common location in fantasy. However, when the characters and the plot of a secondary world fantasy novel are inextricable from their city setting, and that city is itself a character, then you have city-state fantasy.

Point of Hopes, the first in a series of novels in the 1990’s by Melissa Scott and Lisa A. Barnett, fits well in that tradition. In particular it follows a line that goes from the city of Tremontaine (as written by Ellen Kushner in her Riverside novels and stories, through Point of Hopes, and on to works like Silasta, the aforementioned City of Lies, or the many Maradaine novels of Marshall Ryan Maresca, or the Kithamar novels of Daniel Abraham). I had read Point of Hopes (but not its sequels) in the mid 1990s, and so this first volume was a re-read for me.

Point of Hopes is set in a world where the city of Astreaint is not an individual political entity, it is the capital of a kingdom. However. all of the action takes place within its borders (aside from one culminating excursion). Astreaint’s technology is in our terms in mid to late 16th century in terms of firearms--flintlock firearms are just starting to replace wheellock firearms. Other technology we see seems to be in keeping with the period except for one thing that is definitely ahead of the curve, and that is clocks.

Astreaint, you see, and the entire world from what we can tell, is obsessed with keeping time, and the precise knowing of the hour is important. Why? Well, because in this world, magic most definitely exists, and more importantly, astrology here is both a magic and a science, and the stars most definitely affect one’s proclivities and strengths. It is made clear that the stars and one’s astrology are not *destiny* but they are a strong factor that cannot and should not be discounted in considering things like one’s occupation or career. So, knowing when you were born, as accurately as possible, is something that is rather important to the people in the world of Astreaint.

Oh, and there is one interesting bit, not used as much as it might be in this novel. And that is the world of Astreaint has two suns. There is a regular sun and a “winter sun” and it is clear that the orbital dynamics of the solar system are rather interesting (assuming this is a Copernican model of the universe, not at all certain of that!). I found myself imagining the lighting challenges of photography and graphic arts in capturing images in this world.

There are other forms of magic which are studied and practiced in Astreaint, too, particularly necromancy. The form of necromancy we get in the Point of Hopes universe is speaking with the spirits of the dead, that is to say, ghosts. The necromancer we meet in the story, a secondary character, becomes important less because of his skill in this area, and more in his more general skill as a sorcerer in general.

Our two main characters, our point of view characters who are on a slow burn romance (that will not bear fruit until later books) are an interesting mismatched pair. Nicolas Rathe is our street smart, from the streets pointsman (police man) who knows all the criminals and knows his beat rather well. He walks the mean streets of Astreaint, and, in contrast to many of his counterparts and fellow members on the force, is honest and doesn’t take bribes. On the other hand, he does have a friendship with a Wilson Fisk like character, Caiazzo. Caiazzo definitely is a crime lord but also has a lot of legitimate businesses.

Philip Eslingen is a soldier who has just finished a stint in a mercenary company for a rival nation, looking to bide his time and find some side work in Astreaint until, possibly, campaigning season starts again and he can pick up the trade of war once more. He’s good at fighting and relatively honest, and a pretty solid shot with his guns. He is a foreigner, however, and is used to show the prejudice the residents of Astreaint can have against Leaguers like him (the two nations fought a war recently, and even if there is trade between them).

These two meet as the city propels itself toward its annual fair, a celebration that this year is tainted and under threat, and forces Rathe and Eslingen into an uneasy but slow burning partnership and friendship.

The actual main plot, once we get the city and its nature and the nature of this world under its feet, is a mystery: many children are disappearing, more than be accounted for in the usual set of young people running away from their guild positions, or running to join mercenary companies, or trading caravans, or the like. How and why the children are disappearing does in fact, as you might expect, ties in directly to the astrology of the setting, but who and what and why I will leave for you to discover.

I will point out that the book is a slow burn in far more than just the romance. The plotting of the book is distinctly sedate if not slow. This gives us a lot of time to soak in and get to know Eslingen and Rathe and the characters around them rather well, as well as the world that they inhabit, before we get the plot in full motion. This may be a slight weakness to readers with modern sensibilities who want more crackle and pop and forward momentum from the get go. We get to meet a lot of characters, set up a lot of situations and take time in getting things together. The sheer legwork a pointsman has to do in finding that there IS a problem and that it is worse than anyone suspects does consume a fair amount of the book. It does give us through Rathe an opportunity to meet a variety of characters and see a variety of areas of the city, not just in his district (point), the titular Point of Hopes. It goes to, perhaps to a fault, to my thesis about city state fantasy making the city a character in and of itself. Astreaint definitely is definitely described in detail as the novel progresses. But it may take too long for modern readers.


Aside from that, however, I think the book has aged rather well. I did recall the incident that is depicted on the old cover of the book quite well (and rather disappointed, however, to learn that they were distinctly far more minor characters in the overall scheme of things than I had realized.). The casual accepted queerness of the novel’s setting is something I had not recalled in the earlier reading, but here, it is clear that Astreaint is close to what we would call queernorm, with one of the main characters possibly bisexual. No one makes any hay or deal out of it. Also, the role and positions of women in the world of Astreaint are strong and equal to men. The monarch is a queen, we come across many important members of the community as being women, including members and leaders of the Points themselves.

In fact, Point of Hopes makes it clear you can take an early Renaissance setting, not quite a analog of our own world, and improve on it by making it queer friendly, and balanced in terms of the roles and social power and position of women and men in society. This is a lesson that Point of Hopes got right three decades ago. And gets it right today, now that it is widely available again.

--

Highlights:
  • Strong sense of place and location
  • Queer and diverse world
  • A successful relaunch of a fantasy classic 

Reference: Barnett, Lisa and Scott, Melissa, Point of Hopes, [Queen of Swords Press re-release, 2024]


POSTED BY: Paul Weimer. Ubiquitous in Shadow, but I’m just this guy, you know? @princejvstin.

A City on Mars, by Kelly and Zach Weinersmith

$
0
0

The most charming, entertaining cold blanket to ever rain death on my joyful dream of space-settlement

Cover design by Stephanie Ross; Cover art by Zach Weinersmith

Before Kelly and Zach Weinersmith released what would become a Hugo-award winning Best Related Work, most people1 only know of them through Zach Weinersmith’s webcomic, Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal. I’ve been an avid fan of SMBC for years, charmed and impressed by its clever willingness to combine deep discussions of philosophy, robotics, mathematics, economics, religion, literature and linguistics with some pretty crude humor. And sex.2 So I was naturally curious to see what would come out of a writing duo composed of Zach Weinersmith and the woman who was willing to live with him, Kelly Weinersmith.

And the answer is a darn good book! A City on Mars is a discussion of the scientific, ethical, and legal obstacles that stand in the way of actually building settlements on other planets, asteroids, moons, or space stations. Since reality is no fun, the Weinersmiths bear the unenviable task of breaking the news to us that, honestly, space settlement is probably not going to be feasible for a very, very long time. They don’t like it any more than we do. They say so in the introduction: they started out wanting to write this book buoyed by the enthusiasm engendered of burgeoning space tech industries. We’re so close! they thought. What are those last steps before we have a city on Mars?

And then they did the research, and discovered the full extent of the depressing Well Actually. And because they are killjoys (or perhaps because they already had the book deal), they decided to kill our joy too. But because they are not complete monsters, they do it delightfully, with sympathy and wit and a kind-hearted touch that crushes all our hopes into stardust no less thoroughly for all the gentleness of their approach.

The book is organized according to the types of obstacles that need to be overcome. First, the Weinsersmiths discuss the known biological complications of weeks or months in zero-gravity, combined with the unknown—but, extrapolating from zero-g, probably non-trivial!--biological complications of long-term or permanent life in low-gravity. There is an appropriate degree of poop-centered discussion, and due diligence given to the procreative act in space. Proposed technological ameliorations of various degrees of wackiness are laid out, of which a representative sample include 'sucking pants' (to encourage fluids to circulate more freely through the lower half of the body) and the 'snuggle tunnel' (to counteract Newton's third law, which complicates thrusting motions in zero-g). The broad takeaway is that, for a self-sustaining city with natural population growth (i.e., more births than deaths/departures), we would need to be able to gestate, birth, and raise children in lower-than-earth gravity; and given the known complications of reduced gravity on healthier-than-average, trained, consenting adults, it would be wildly unethical to impose such conditions on children.

Next, there is a discussion of where such a space settlement might be situated, with considerations not just of Mars, but also the moon, or space stations. We get some really fascinating discussions of the technology that would be needed to make such settlements airtight, including meditations on the convenience of lava tunnels and warnings about the dangers of regolith dust (very pointy particles). The broad takeaway here is that it would be so wildly expensive to do it, that there is no possible way that any degree of mining or resource exploitation from asteroids or planets could make it economically viable. Just because raw materials might be available in situ doesn’t mean they can be easily transformed into the resources needed to build and maintain a settlement, and transporting them back to earth as an economic export isn’t any better. As the Weinersmiths put it, ‘It does you no good to know the asteroids are worth $700 trillion if it costs $700 trillion and ten cents to get them to market. After all, if you’re willing to just ignore the cost of acquisition, you’re really better off digging on Earth. Earth contains about 10^23 tons of iron. If we assume a value of $100 a ton, that’s roughly a bajillion zillion hojillion dollars’ worth of iron.’3

After a brief discussion of not-entirely-unsuccessful attempts at creating self-sustaining miniature biomes on earth (in brief, the participants were not dead at the end of it), the Weinersmiths then move on to the less sciency but equally important consideration of law. How does the philosophy of ownership work in space? (Latin figures here, as does John Locke.) How does public vs. private control work? How does international legal jurisdiction work? What laws are already in place, are they adequate to govern settlements, and what would it take to change them? I found this absolutely fascinating—not least because so much of the discussion of space settlement focuses on the STEM-related challenges, while the Humanities, Social Sciences, and Jeff Goldblum turn out to have some important contributions. 

The book concludes with an unnerving discussion that fans The Expanse are already familiar with: the ease of destroying a planet by chucking rocks at it from space. In brief: it’s very easy, and the more settlements in space we have — and especially the more contentious those settlement politics get (see: Humanities and Social Sciences) — the likelier it is to happen.

It’s rather a bleak picture. Space settlement is not going to solve any of the problems we have on earth — not economic, not political, not philosophical. (There is no evidence that living in space grants any real novel perspective on life; post-space astronauts are as nutso as the rest of us. Also, they always lie on their psych exams.) And certainly it won't be any kind of solution to climate problems. Any environment off Earth is going to be wildly worse to live in than the most horrible worst-case climate disaster we can imagine here. The Weinersmiths propose a very revealing litmus test: if you run around outside naked for ten minutes, will you be alive at the end of it? On Earth, no matter how climate-changed, the answer will usually be yes. Anywhere else, the answer will most definitely be no.

However, the book is so charmingly written that I didn’t feel bad taking my medicine. Zach Weinersmith contributes lots of entertaining illustrations, and both Weinersmiths have absolutely nailed the right tone here: Look, they say. We’re like you. We’re not experts (or, at least, Zach isn’t; Kelly Weinersmith is a member of the faculty in biosciences at Rice University), but we’re pretty smart , and we’re super interested in this. And we spent a lot of time doing the research and talking to the experts and going to the conferences and reading the histories, reports, and other primary suorces. We know all the bits and bobs of space trivia that caught your attention in the first place, and we can tell you what actually happened, not just that Twitter thread that you shared.4 And we really, really wanted the answer to be more encouraging. But it’s just not. It sucks, dude. Sorry.

Yes, it does suck. But if someone had to shatter my dreams, I couldn’t have asked for them to be shattered more nicely. A very well-deserved Hugo.

——

1 Fine, okay me! I’m most people! For the duration of this review I hold absolute power over words herein and the meanings thereof, and I so decree that my opinions of the world are, for the next 1200 words or so, shared by the majority of the rest of humanity.
2 There is an awful lot of sex in SMBC, which I'm acutely aware of every time I consider whether some brilliantly erudite commentary on type vs. token phoneme frequency is appropriate to put on my office door.
3 When I shared this gem of expository wit with my spouse, he responded severely, ‘That’s not the right number. It’s $10^25.’ My spouse is a mathematics teacher, and highly allergic to flights of fancy that neglect the basic tenets of scientific notation.
4 The one about the 100 tampons being sent up with the first female astronaut? That wasn’t NASA dudes being clueless about menstruation. A female astronaut/doctor, Dr Rhea Seddon, was involved in making the decision. And the decision settled on 100 tampons because NASA’s approach to supplies was ‘take the absolute maximum amount you can imagine needing under any circumstances, double it, and then add 50%.’ Which is, y’know, not a terrible idea!

——

Highlights

Nerd coefficient: 9/10, very high quality/standout in its category

  •  Buzzkill
  •  Killjoy
  •  Dream-crusher
  •  Full of fascinating facts about the challenges across sciences and humanities preventing us from settling space
  • Cute illustrations

Reference: Weinersmith, Kelly and Zach. A City on Mars. [Particular Books, 2023].

CLARA COHEN lives in Scotland in a creaky old building with pipes for gas lighting still lurking under her floorboards. She is an experimental linguist by profession, and calligrapher and Islamic geometric artist by vocation. During figure skating season she does blather on a bit about figure skating. She is on Mastodon at wandering.shop/@ergative.

 


Cool Books I Read While I Was Too Overwhelmed To Review

$
0
0

You want reviews? I've got reviews! Small ones!

Back in February, I rounded up some recent-ish books that I received review copies of, and read, but couldn't find the time or headspace to review at the time. Well, surprise! There were more books that I still hadn't got around to reviewing! This is the second round of clearing the decks for me, inspired in no small part by all the great reviewers and creators I got to hang out with at Glasgow Worldcon. Let's get back into it:

The Last Hero by Linden A. Lewis wraps up the trilogy that began with The First Sister, and it's a book that particularly deserves attention for anyone looking for more books in the vein of Emily Tesh's Hugo winning Some Desperate Glory. While Lewis' trilogy doesn't have that book's 90 degree plot swerves, it offers a much deeper look at what radicalisation and deprogramming look like when the bullets are actually flying, and we get to watch the young protagonists from across different factions—the fundamentalist Geans, the caste-based Icarii and the marginalised Asters—grapple with what is expected of them within their respective systems, and the price of trying to overthrow them. Add in some great bits of worldbuilding and a hefty dose of character gender feelings, and you've got a trilogy well worth checking out.

The Bone Shard War by Andrea Stewart also closes out a trilogy (the Drowning Empire) about exploitation and the cost of change, and especially grapples with the question of who ends up on top when said exploitative system is overthrown. It is also, deliciously, about earnest but silly youths in love, who are being kept apart and even forced into betrayals! At this end of the Drowning Empire, the brutally high cost of bone shard magic isn't as viscerally present, and that feels like a bit of a loss despite the emergence of new magics and the rediscovery of how this world functions, and (relatedly) what those cute animal companions that the main characters picked up have been about this whole time. While it has its ups and downs, this is a cool trilogy by an author I hope to see even better things from in future.

Book three, but not a series ender, The Mystery of Dunvegan Castle by T.L. Huchu is part of the Edinburgh Nights series, and while I'll forgive this year's Hugo voters for not putting it on the best series ballot, my patience on that front is not endless (nor will the series be). These books are the chronicles of Ropa Moyo, a highly motivated Zimbabwean-Scottish teenager who is offered entry to a prestigious occult library... as an unpaid intern. This time, Ropa's aspirations and hustle come fully up against the barriers placed in her way, and this series does a great job of showing how institutional racism and classism are perpetuated not just by bigots in the institution, but by people who limit their allyship or try to offer "meritocratic" entry points rather than fighting the corner for marginalised people. It's an interesting shift for Ropa—who, to this point, has been a bit naive about her circumstances and whether she can just push through them—and it makes me even more eager to see what book 4 brings.

System Collapse by Martha Wells. The second Murderbot novel feels structurally closer to the novellas than the previous Murderbot novel, and at this point the recommendation is "if you like Murderbot, you'll like this Murderbot." Unlike the rather static-feeling Fugitive Telemetry, System Collapse does push things onwards from Network Effect in an interesting way, both literally (conflict de-escalation through documentaries!) and in Murderbot's character development and how it narrates its story. We quickly learn that Murderbot is not working at full capacity, and that it is keeping something from us about how this happened, and while the reader is used to the quirks and selectiveness of Murderbot's narration, this withheld information immediately puts the reader off balance, adding an extra layer of tension to both the conflicts and the crew relationships that are both staples of this series. Of course Murderbot and friends save the day with the power of love and justice—not that Murderbot itself puts it quite that way.

The Ten Percent Thief by Lavanya Lakshminarayan wasn't a Subjective Chaos Award winner this year, but it was an interesting addition to a stacked ballot. This mosaic novel, centred around a future Bangalore now known as Apex City, shows us the ins and outs of a society where citizens are constantly tested against the "Bell Curve". The city's residents are constantly striving - through conspicuous displays of capitalist productivity - to be promoted to the super-privileged ten percent, and to avoid deportation outside the city to join the "Analogs", who are treated as sub-human and denied basic ameneties by a city that nevertheless relies on them for its continuation. Through the novel, we see both confident Virtuals and those barely clinging on inside the system, as new technologies create further alienation; we also see, though not with as much depth as I would like, the way in which Analogs are organising themselves to resist and overthrow their oppressors. It didn't add up as well as I wanted it to, but there's a lot going on here for readers to enjoy, especially if you like Black Mirror-esque technological absurdities and the overthrow of transparent dystopias.

Untethered Sky by Fonda Lee was just beneath the Hugo finalist cut-off this year, and it's a very well-crafted fantasy novella: Ester's story has a strong thread of revenge, but there's also more going on: her progressing in her vocation as a rukher to a roc named Zahra, the relationships she builds with her comrades (and her bird), and the strains of being part of a military campaign whose political and propaganda motives seem at odds with actually making the Kingdom safer. Untethered Sky does suffer from the "author of incredible thing (Green Bone Saga) goes on to write pretty good thing" but it works great. 

The Lies of the Ajungo by Moses Ose Utomi is an incredible book, and somehow it's not on the Hugo longlist, but it is on the Ignyte novella shortlist so we can celebrate that recognition at least! The best thing about this story is its worldbuilding, which feels like it's come straight out of a fable: the protagonist comes from the "City of Lies," which has made the terrible bargain to cut the tongue out of every adult resident in return for an annual allocation of water from the Ajungo. This, of course, means that its residents can no longer tell their own story, and that their own history is now in the hands of their oppressors. When almost-13-year-old Tutu leaves the city in search of water to save his mother, he somehow avoids the disappearance that has befallen every other child who has left, and instead he finds out the truth behind the Ajungo's conquests and where his city falls within it. Amazing stuff.

Finally, Earth-space adventure Beyond the Hallowed Sky by Ken MacLeod, fantasy adventure The Wolf of Oren-Yaro by K.S. Villoso, and mecha-YA Moonstorm by Yoon Ha Lee are all series openers which fall into the "fun, but probably not reading on" category for me—a category which I need to be more firm in maintaining, as the list of books gets bigger and my time on this Earth grows shorter (fatalistic? me?) I did enjoy MacLeod's speculation of near-future superpower blocs, especially the split between Anglophone death capitalism and optimistic-but-also-vaguely-sinister European socialism; and The Wolf of Oren-Yaro did not disappoint with its main character's Bitch Queen credentials, but had me shrugging at its relative cliffhanger ending rather than rushing to download the second book. Moonstorm, I am simply not the target audience for, and that's OK! I think this is a great contender for the Lodestar list, especially since books by authors who have also been nominated for adult SFF do very well there, and I hope that this story of giant robots, terrible empires, friendships, rivalries and betrayals IN SPACE finds each and every one of its people.



Adri, Nerds of a Feather co-editor, is a semi-aquatic migratory mammal most often found in the UK. She has many opinions about SFF books, and is also partial to gaming, baking, interacting with dogs, and Asian-style karaoke. Find her on Bluesky at adrijjy.bsky.social.

Film review: Kalki 2898 AD

$
0
0

A clash of past against future, tyrants against gods, ambition against destiny

The latest blockbuster to come from epic Indian cinema, Kalki 2989 AD is India's most expensive film so far. Set in a far future beset by hunger, despotism and hopelessness, it follows a handful of improbable heroes struggling to bring about a new era of peace.

The background context for this film is the Kurukshetra War, a pivotal moment in epic Indian literature. According to the Sanskrit poem Mahabharata, two related clans, the Pandavas and the Kauravas, fought each other brutally for eighteen days over control of the Kingdom of Hastinapura. Toward the end of the war, one formidable soldier allied with the Kauravas, Ashwatthama, upon seeing that his side was losing, hurled a weapon of divine might against princess Uttara, who was pregnant with the last surviving heir of the Pandavas. The hero Krishna, an earthly incarnation of the god Vishnu, stopped the attack and cursed Ashwatthama to walk the earth for centuries.

The film takes these events and gives them a continuation in our far future. The opening credits, which consist of a digital animation of scenes from the Kurukshetra War, end in a close-up of a CGI shoot of grass that blends into an identical-looking, real shoot of grass. The meaning is clear: the realm of myth extends into the real world. In this future setting, the Kali Yuga, the cosmic era ruled by sin and perversion, is nearing its end, and the hero Kalki, the next incarnation of Vishnu, who will restore the world and put an end to evil, is about to be born. Unfortunately, the tyrant who controls the last surviving human city has a habit of kidnapping fertile women for horrific experiments to try and extend his own lifespan. It is one of those women who is carrying the foretold savior of humankind.

Kalki 2898 AD does a good job of explaining the basics of its massive lore, but for Western viewers it wouldn't hurt to brush up on their Hindu mythology. Much of the emotional impact of the plot (especially the return of Ashwatthama as an eight-foot-tall badass immortal) relies on the audience's assumed familiarity with and personal investment in Hindu eschatology. This is not like watching a movie about Hercules or Achilles, where we know the relevant myths but don't take them as historical fact. Rather, imagine if the plot of Left Behind happened in the setting of Mad Max, and, more importantly, imagine that you're a devoted believer. The tacit position of the film, and of its intended audience, is that the Mahabaratha narrates actual events that happened in real life. Whereas Western scriptwriters and directors will probably not feel any reverence for the Olympian gods, to a huge portion of the Indian population the Hindu gods are very real. Keep that in mind as you sit to watch.

Once the stakes are defined, the film becomes a series of frantic chase scenes between bad guys and good guys trying to snatch this desperate pregnant woman who never asked to occupy such an important position. Combat scenes are a mixed bag: while Ashwatthama (now tasked with protecting Kalki's mother until he can be born) commands every scene he appears in with his imposing presence and impeccable acting (no surprise there, since he's played by cinema legend Amitabh Bachchan), his sometimes rival, a bounty hunter named Bhairava, is comparably strong, but the visual effects used in his fighting moves are too obviously fake. Nameless mooks get smashed against the walls like bowling pins, making Bhairava's battles (even the all-important one at the end) look more comical than awesome.

Visual effects in general are a problem with this film. Landscape shots look impressive, but the objects moving in the foreground seem copied and pasted from a stock photo archive. Together with the Zack Snyder-style yellowish tint that was applied all over the film, the disorienting editing between sequences and even within the same scene, the ill-advised use of fast motion for dramatic effect, and the cringeworthy sense of humor, these moviemaking choices rob Kalki 2898 AD of the majestic aura it wants to claim.

Your enjoyment of the protagonist, bounty hunter Bhairava, will depend on how much patience you have for the lovable rogue archetype. Take Han Solo, but replace Chewbacca with KITT from Knight Rider, and you'll get the idea. It's interesting that Bhairava starts the movie in opposition to the aims of divine prophecy, but gradually becomes an antiheroic figure who fights the villains for selfish reasons. Alas, the rest of the cast isn't fleshed out at all. The expectant mother of the god Vishnu is treated as a standard-issue damsel in distress; the generic mid-level commander who persecutes our heroes is stuck in the role of generic mid-level commander; the supporting heroes are an interchangeable collection of cool gadgets and catchphrases; and the minor villains are disposable meat. That's a common problem with plots built on prophecy: characters don't need to grow, because victory is already written in stone.

This film is the first entry in a planned Kalki Cinematic Universe that has already produced a prequel series. Accordingly, Kalki 2898 AD ends in a cliffhanger that renders much of its plot moot. In a discouraging imitation of Hollywood's worst habits, the film even has a post-credits scene that teases a bigger battle with the final boss. It's clear that the producers want to go big with this, but the studio needs to hire better scriptwriters, and the visual effects aren't yet at a level capable of delivering a spectacle deserving of awe.


Nerd Coefficient: 7/10.

POSTED BY: Arturo Serrano, multiclass Trekkie/Whovian/Moonie/Miraculer, accumulating experience points for still more obsessions.

Microreview: Strange Darling

$
0
0

A wild ride of a thriller that will subvert every expectation you think you have — go in without knowing much. (Spoiler-free review)


What would happen if you crossed a Tarantino film with a Coen brothers movie — and threw in a little Longlegs?

You'd get Strange Darling. Honestly, this review was supposed to be about the new Crow movie, but that cinematic venture is currently sitting at 20%, and I got seriously dismayed about having to sit through what's apparently horrible. 

I was led to Strange Darling by several of my favorite movie critics and podcasters calling it the surprise of the year, and one of the leading contenders for favorite-of-the-year even. This, coupled with a nigh unthinkable 97% on Rotten Tomatoes changed my focus.

I went in blind on the trust of internet strangers that know more about movies than I do, and I was rewarded. (I love these types of movies, the out-of-nowhere flicks that fans beg viewers to go in as blind as possible. It happens so rarely in these days of endless Spidermen and spoiler-y sequels.)

It would be very easy to spoil Strange Darling, and that's why it's very important that you read as little as possible about it. I'm going to sell you on it, however, with as much bravura and insight as I can without giving anything away. 

First off, it's a non-linear serial killer story that actually works. Usually, I detest out-of-sync narrative chapters because they tend to be lazy ways of spicing up a story. With Strange Darling, the non-linear sections are absolutely imperative to what, and when, and how we learn details about the plot. It makes you feel like the first time you watched Pulp Fiction or Memento, like you're a kid in a film class learning about the different ways stories are told. 

The sound editing, production design, and actings are all superb — the two main leads aren't famous (yet) but ground the characters that we spend so much time with. It's gorgeously shot, and feels strangely out of time, despite the fact that the characters have cell phones..

This movie is gory and violent and scary, but there is enough comic relief and small moments of tension relief that it's not a complete sensory onslaught. 

If you like horror/thrillers, you owe it to yourself to see this shot-on-35mm gem in a theater with absolutely no expectations save for a good time. 



--

The Math

Baseline Score: 8

Bonus: I haven't been able to stop thinking about the breakfast scene in Ed Begley Jr.'s farm house and probably never will.

POSTED BY: Haley Zapal is a lawyer-turned-copywriter living in Atlanta, Georgia. A co-host of Hugo Award-winning podcast Hugo, Girl!, she posts on Instagram as @cestlahaley. She loves nautical fiction, growing corn and giving them pun names like Timothee Chalamaize, and thinking about fried chicken.

Review: House of Open Wounds by Adrian Tchaikovsky

$
0
0

The Tyrant Philosophers series continues in a new setting

War? What is it good for? For the Palleseen, it's absolutely everything. Converting the world to their materialistic and rationalistic philosophy by armed force means that, in order to fight effectively, they are willing to try a number of things to keep their armies effective, including a rather special medical unit. As the Palleseen fight against their opposite and equal number on the battlefield, the members of that medical unit find that the costs of war are higher than even they can imagine.

This is the story of Adrian Tchaikovsky's House of Open Wounds.

The first book in the series, City of Last Chances (reviewed by Roseanna here at NOAF) featured a rotating set of points of view, including Yasnic, a priest of a small god who has diminished so much that his name is just God, a peculiar god of healing. At the end of that book, he finally fell into the hands of the Palleseen conquerors. In House of Open Wounds, set sometime later, we find out what they decided to do with him. And that is to assign him to a medical unit, an experimental medical unit. After all, he is a priest of a god of Healing, right?

House of Open Wounds is the story of this medical unit and its characters, all broken in very strange ways. The metaphor I kept coming up with as we started to learn about the characters and slowly learn their stories is that this novel comes across as a mixture of M*A*S*H and Glen Cook's The Black Company. The hospital staff are all misfits, quirky, odd and weird. One might say, in the Pals parlance, that none of them are even near to be perfected. But since there is a war on, the Hospital unit is just barely tolerated (and the threat of its dissolution hangs over the unit throughout the book), and so the misfits of the hospital do the best they can in an endless cycle of war.

This book gives the spotlight to the relatively large cast of the hospital, as they find themselves in a number of locations and conflicts. They are not often in combat, but when that happens, it is a catastrophic and dangerous event, since even with some of the limited resources on hand, the hospital unit staff are not very effective fighters. But Tchaikovsky leaves the prospect of direct action only as a vague threat for much of the book (until he doesn't) and focuses the staff on the conflicts and considerations between each other, and with the rest of the army.

I've already mentioned Yasic (who finds himself with a new name to his chagrin, Maric Jack) but there are plenty of other memorable characters here, who conflict with each other, the army, the war and anything else. Banders, the most promoted (and subsequently demoted) soldier in the army. The Butcher himself, who is holding a very dark secret as to his alchemical skills and just why he is so good a surgeon. Fellow-Inquirer Prassel, who is a necromancer, who only gets new material if the Butcher and company cannot save someone. Cosserby, who can make golem-like servitors, but whose work is looked on with extreme suspicion by the powers that be. It's a whole set of misfits, and early on, Yasnic/Maric Jack (who is new to the unit) is introduced to all of them and what they do, cleverly giving us the essentials upon which the author then sets these characters into motion.

In other words, this would be a hell of an Apocalypse World-style game setting, with a bunch of misfits and castoffs, all of whom are keeping secrets (sometimes not even knowing that they HAVE a secret) and all of whom don't fit in with the rest of the army or with the world in general, all trying to get along with each other and with their lives, but the war keeps getting in the way.

This makes House of Open Wounds, for all of its interesting setting and worldbuilding, ultimately a very character-focused novel. This is not to say that Tchaikovsky's work has skimped on character before or that he hasn't had a good sense of characters in previous novels, but a lot of this novel is driven by putting these quirky, broken, unusual misfits in a pressure cooker (or an instant pot), turning it on, increasing the pressure, and watching what happens to them.

However, it's not all grim and humorless, just like M*A*S*H is a dark comedy. There is a lot of dark humor throughout, as one might expect. In addition to that, Tchaikovsky knows his pacing and timing, especially in a long novel, so there are definite rhythms to the war and its progress. An endless sequence of battles would wear down readers and characters alike, and so one of the most interesting worldbuilding bits and sequences in the entire book is when the hospital is sent to a distant front far away.

Given the time and logistics of doing so, the Pals use one of their incorporated people's magics to deploy flying islands for the purpose. Thus the hospital, and many others, are loaded onto a giant flying island and flown to the site of the new front. This gives a fair chunk of downtime away from the battle, and allows us to breathe and the characters to rest, and we get to see new and different sides to the characters when they aren't awaiting the conveyor belt of the results of war. It is not the climax of the book (the climax is rather interesting and different, and brings together some of the characters' secrets into a cohesive and satisfactory whole), but I think that it is its centerpiece, because it gives us a chance to really see these characters and think about the whole project of war and what they are doing and why. It is no surprise that when the island lands, Tchaikovsky plunges the hospital staff into an even worse conflict than when they left, and ramps us toward that finale.

It seems that whenever you are talking about epic military fantasy of this type, whether you will it or not, Malazan comes to sit at the table. Steven Erikson's Malazan books, with their devoted legion of fans that can be rather frightening in their passion, may well be the standard against which epic fantasy series are measured. Even 20 years after its initial release, I note that, for example, Subterranean Press is now in a third printing of Gardens of the Moon, the first in the series, at the high value, quality and cost that Subterranean Press editions fetch.

So how does this compare? If you are a reader of Malazan, you like your intense deep history worldbuilding, with strange gods, magic, morally grey characters, and military grade action and adventure. This novel is set in a military hospital, so our protagonists don't do a lot of fighting (when the war comes TO them, it's usually a disaster). But otherwise, there are a lot of parallels one could make here. The Pals and their rationalistic program of trying to convert the world to their philosophy, their logic of empire, will feel awfully familiar to Malazan fans. Characters like Banders, The Butcher and many of the others could be dropped into the Bridgeburners, or have the Pals fight the Malazans. The Seven Cities would definitely be in need of some correction in the Pals' eyes. There are definite differences in tone and style, and I personally think Tchaikovsky can write circles around Erikson, but people looking to scratch that "Malazan itch" (and given the sales and popularity, it is definitely there in the SFF community), House of Open Wounds is here for you.

This is the second book in the Tyrant Philosophers series, but aside from Yasnic/Maric Jack, God, and the common universe they are set in, it is a character sequel but not a full-on sequel to City of Last Chances. And like the rest of the characters, we get Yasnic/Maric Jack's backstory, as he tells it, in an abbreviated fashion but enough to make us understand him and his deal. This is all to say that, especially as these are chonky thick books and time is finite, if a character-focused story in a medical unit in a fantasy war really sounds like your jam, you could skip City of Last Chances and jump into this world here at House of Open Wounds. While Tchiakovsky is building and developing his world across books, you could start here if you really want.

House of Open Wounds, with its setting and selection of characters, does something untried and new in the epic fantasy genre, with his characteristic penchant for invention, worldbuilding and eminently devourable writing. It's rare for a writer to attempt, much less put out a high output and succeed at a wide variety of subgenres in SFF. However, House of Open Wounds continues to show that Adrian Tchaikovsky is definitely one of those writers.


Highlights:

  • Strong character focused military fantasy set in a military hospital
  • Excellent worldbuilding and depth
  • Lots of dark and grim humour. 
  • Fantastic cover art for this book and for the series as a whole.

Reference: Tchaikovsky, Adrian. House of Open Wounds (Tyrant Philosophers Book 2) [Head of Zeus, 2023].

POSTED BY: Paul Weimer. Ubiquitous in Shadow, but I’m just this guy, you know? @princejvstin.

The Wheel of Time Reread: Knife of Dreams

$
0
0
Welcome back, dear readers, to The Wheel of Time Reread. Today we’re going to talk about Knife of Dreams, the eleventh book in the series. This is the last novel Robert Jordan wrote before he passed away in 2007. Following this, Jordan worked on what he intended to be the final novel of The Wheel of Time: A Memory of Light, but was not able to complete it. We’ll discuss this quite a bit more when we get to the final three novels co-written by Brandon Sanderson.

Knife of Dreams follows nearly three years after the publication of Crossroads of Twilight, which I noted was the most disappointing novel of the series and one which made me question the future of the series. Knife of Dreams restored my faith in Wheel of Time and reaffirmed my love of The Wheel of Time.

Suffice it to say that there will be spoilers, especially one particular plot point in the last battle in the last book.

Knife of Dreams reads like Robert Jordan finally decided to get serious after Crossroads of Twilight. He got all his pieces where he wanted them on the board (again, finally) and it was time to start making moves. Perrin rescuing Faile from the Shaido Aiel? Let’s go. Confirming Elayne as the Queen of Andor? Do it. Egwene immediately making moves to undermine Elaida in the White Tower despite being a prisoner? Not wasting any time here. Mat marrying The Daughter of the Nine Moons? Rand battles a Forsaken? Galad somewhat inadvertently taking over the Whitecloaks? Lan riding to the borderlands for the Last Battle and Nynaeve sets him up with an army he doesn’t want? Loial gets married?!

There’s a lot going on in Knife of Dreams and it all actually feels important, which is all the more remarkable after Crossroads of Twilight, a novel in which almost nothing felt important.

I’ve long considered The Shadow Rising to be my favorite Wheel of Time novel but now that I’m so close to the end of my Wheel of Time reread I wonder if it’s not actually Knife of Dreams. The Shadow Rising has Rhuidian, which I can’t express just how thrilling it was the first (dozen?) times I read it - but Knife of Dreams just has so much movement.

Knife of Dreams also has the beginning of Egwene’s true rebellion against Elaida and the White Tower. Egwene in captivity is probably my favorite storyline in all of the series, and it’s one that continues in The Gathering Storm with even more strength. But it begins here. Egwene’s dignity in understanding her position as a captive but taking every moment to quietly sow seeds of dissent against Elaida and demonstrating how a real Amyrlin should comport herself is something special in this series.

I know how this all ends, and I’m still upset that Egwene never gets the change to be a transcendent Amyrlin following The Last Battle, but between how she begins to reunite the Tower and her later actions in the Last Battle - she is going to go down as an absolute legend.

Everything else in this novel is very good. Egwene is *great*.

Also, as with all things relating to Wheel of Time, I reject the internal chronology that from start to finish the entire series only spans two years. I think Egwene is only a captive in the White Tower for a couple of weeks, which doesn’t seem nearly long enough for her quiet resistance to build the allies and support it does. This is months in my head, which much better fits my head canon of the series being something like 5-6 years in duration rather than 2. Of course, months may be too long for how the Salidar rebellion / siege of the Tower lasted without Egwene but it’s not like everything ties together perfectly anyhow.

Knife of Dreams is the novel to look forward to if you’ve been sticking with the series but experiencing some frustration with pacing and disappointment - but if you’ve read through ten books and aren’t sure if book eleven is worth it than I’m not quite sure what to say is that Knife of Dreams begins a very strong ride to the end.

 


Joe Sherry - Senior Editor of Nerds of a Feather. Hugo and Ignyte Award Winner. Minnesotan.

Viewing all 3569 articles
Browse latest View live